Page 23 of 32

Re: 365 Nicollet - (Opus Ritz block)

Posted: September 13th, 2016, 3:24 pm
by uncle phil
Does anyone think the balconies are strangely reminiscent of Studio Gang's Aqua in Chicago? There, they have horrible problems with thermal bridging because its a continuous slab. I really hope the renderings are just idealistic/representative because that would be a terrible mistake in our climate
Yes, the Strib article specifically mentions Aqua...

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 14th, 2016, 9:16 am
by Archiapolis
<psst>
Every building with post-tensioned concrete floors with balconies has the same problem whether they try to do something architecturally interesting or they are simple rectangles a la Lat 45 et al.

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 14th, 2016, 10:45 am
by MNdible
While that's definitely true, most of the time the projections are limited to the discrete balconies themselves, and not projecting all of the way around the building like they are at Aqua (and like they appear to do here).

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 14th, 2016, 6:41 pm
by Tyler

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 14th, 2016, 7:27 pm
by grant1simons2
I really love when we get to the point where we actually LINK the material. Not even kidding. Helps people understand what's out there.

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 15th, 2016, 7:31 am
by MNdible
I've seen these used in Europe. I'd be stunned if this project was planning on using them.

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 15th, 2016, 10:26 am
by Archiapolis
I've seen these used in Europe. I'd be stunned if this project was planning on using them.
BINGO!

I am aware of how to create a thermal break. However, until these are required by code, you aren't likely to see them until "the market" demands them (read: probably never).

I'm all for them - this is a place where policy and sustainability should align but investors, profits, capitalism, etc.

Aqua: We can certainly argue whether or not it is an architectural conceit but putting aside the design, most "l*xury" condos are going to want a balcony and the more balcony the better. In the case of Aqua, the facade has more or less balcony depending on the floor/design and I'm sure that it affects the price point of one unit over the other. If they had gone to rectangular balconies ONLY at living spaces, it would have made the building less interesting certainly AND also reduced balconies (and thus value of the units). See Lat 45 et al where you have rectangular balconies that comprise 70% of the edge of each floor plate? So, at the end of the day we are talking about 30% more balcony and the accompanying 30% less "opaque" (insulated) building face per plate. 70% thermal bridges across each PT floor plate isn't some great sustainability move, it's cheaper/easier to do rectangles.

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 15th, 2016, 10:31 am
by mnmike
Apologies for being dense here...but what exactly are we discussing? Cold from the outside absorbed by the concrete and transferring into the apartments?

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 15th, 2016, 12:36 pm
by Tyler
Yes. Exactly. And heat in the summer. The concrete acts as a thermal bridge. But its a solvable issue.

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 15th, 2016, 1:05 pm
by mnmike
Ah, thanks! Interesting...hadn't thought of that.

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 15th, 2016, 1:30 pm
by MattW
Apologies for being dense here...but what exactly are we discussing? Cold from the outside absorbed by the concrete and transferring into the apartments?
I also had no idea what a thermal bridge was. Fortunately, the infinite source of knowledge has a pretty good explanation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_bridge.

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 15th, 2016, 3:33 pm
by seamonster
Apologies for being dense here...but what exactly are we discussing?
Stealing Nathan's joke here, but no apology necessary - this crowd is pro-density.

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 15th, 2016, 4:32 pm
by Didier
That's cool technology, but does anyone know if they are putting it on the Ritz?

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 16th, 2016, 7:00 am
by talindsay
I see what you did there.

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 16th, 2016, 9:17 am
by Archiapolis
That's cool technology, but does anyone know if they are putting it on the Ritz?
I'm taking odds on this one if anyone is interested

10/1 that they are not using thermally broken forms for balconies at the Ritz.

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 16th, 2016, 10:42 am
by MNdible
10:1 seems generous. Do we know of a single project in Minnesota that's used this technology?

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 19th, 2016, 10:20 am
by Archiapolis
10:1 seems generous. Do we know of a single project in Minnesota that's used this technology?
I don't have a lot of money to lose in case of some very sustainably-minded developer who was/is willing to incur costs that others are not typical in our market and then not talk about those improvements in a way that they become common knowledge but that's kind of my point.

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 23rd, 2016, 2:28 pm
by grant1simons2



Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 23rd, 2016, 10:52 pm
by uncle phil
It was the Sheraton-Ritz, not the Ritz-Carlton...

Re: Ritz Residences - 365 Nicollet Mall (334' - 30 stories)

Posted: September 24th, 2016, 8:49 am
by grant1simons2
Thank you. Way before my time so I should've checked it.