Page 16 of 19

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: December 30th, 2020, 3:13 pm
by mckilanowski
Now that you mention the facade, doesn't the lot fall in the area of mainstreet that has a few guidelines of what buildings can look like?
I forget where the zone is and what the guidelines are exactly but I know it's in place to keep to a similar style.
https://www.hopkinsmn.com/197/Downtown-Overlay-District

It extends down to 13th Avenue (between St. Gabriel's and the dentist). It could, arguably, be extended as far as 17th, but they didn't ask me.

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: January 2nd, 2021, 4:08 pm
by mckilanowski
Any idea what the feedback was?
No idea. But I doubt staff would voice feedback about density proposed. More likely about façade facing Mainstreet and the Center of the Arts being plain and comparatively non-distinct to what it’s replacing.
Sun Sailor had a bit on it: https://www.hometownsource.com/sun_sail ... a5d94.html

Jason Lindahl, Hopkins city planner, had this quote: "...we don’t think it fits very well with the traditional architecture of the surrounding Mainstreet and downtown..."

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: January 14th, 2021, 6:54 pm
by Anondson
A new Master Developer is being sought for 325 Blake Road in Hopkins again.

https://www.bizjournals.com/twincities/ ... erest.html

Hopes to have one chosen in June 2021.

I’ve still never gotten details for why for previous Master Developer and MCWD were “unable to develop a joint vision for the site or come to terms on a purchase price”. What does “develop a joint vision” even mean?

But the detail about the disagreement about a purchase price is new for me.

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: March 5th, 2021, 6:57 pm
by Anondson
The Beard Group withdrew their Hopkins Cinema Flats proposal, they are re-proposing apartments, 130 units and 3,155 sq ft commercial. Four stories.

It looks like there will be a walking alley between the apartments and 30 Bales, quite a few walk up units. And possible a public cut through along the property south side?

https://hopkinsapartments.com/f/project ... ly-housing

The concept plan will be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning on March 23 and the city council on April 6. No action will be voted on.

https://www.hopkinsmn.com/1070/Hopkins-Apartments

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: March 5th, 2021, 10:39 pm
by Korh
I think I like the new design a bit more then the Cinema Flats proposal. Don't know why they decided to increase the commercial sq ft at the lose of I think of one less unit though.
It also seem the knocked a few parking spots off from the older proposal, but I think they might of been able to get away with losing a few more, I also think the height might be a bit taller in some areas, but they might be able to get away with it if they use that step design in the rendering.

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: March 19th, 2021, 10:51 pm
by Anondson
I heard through the family grape vine, the Sea Level owner has said that the project to redevelop the old strip mall has fallen through.

He said the property owner told him the city wanted it shorter and wanted much more commercial preserved.

I can’t believe the city at all had an opinion on height except by angry NIMBYs who hate that Hopkins is majority renter. But I believe the city was going to push hard for preserving commercial here.

Other interesting news from the Sea Level owner, he has been renting year to year for the past 5 years because the property owner expects to sell the land to a developer.

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: March 31st, 2021, 1:25 pm
by Anondson
The city and MCWD is having a “listening session” by webex tonight at 6:30pm. Apparently interest is high.

https://www.minnehahacreek.org/project/ ... evelopment

It’s been over 10 years since the watershed district bought the property. It’s been a long time while they twiddled thumbs and it’s been off the tax rolls.

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: May 14th, 2021, 4:41 pm
by Anondson
Two things to note.

Turns out the word of mouth from the retailers in the old commercial strip aren’t facts. Whoodaguessed.

Blake Road Station, proposed by Trilogy, is being reworked based on the city requests for preserving affordable retail at the corner of Blake and Excelsior and for upgrading matierials on all four sides of the 3 buildings to “front” faces aesthetically.

So Trilogy is coming to the city to ask for TIF to cover more retail in 2 buildings (instead of a small part of 1 building) and to keep retail spaces affordable (considering the demographics of the area), plus to construct underground parking that would be needed for the extra retail requested by the city (as Hopkins has not ditched parking minimums for commercial).

770 units for Blake Road Station after the redesign. In 3 buildings. The first building, Building A where the liquor store, chiropractor, and Sea Level store is is proposed to have 2,000 sq ft retail, instead of 0.


Second item, from the Work Study session this past week, a developer could be coming forward to ask for rezoning the offices at 6th St S and 5th St S to allow residential, maybe potential for senior housing. Up to 600 units of housing could replace this office building in South Hopkins.

The office is a distant walk to LRT stations, but has nice access to Nine Mile Creek trail and will be a short walk to the neighborhood commercial node at 11th and 7th so more residents could be a positive for South Hopkins, IMO.

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: May 14th, 2021, 7:49 pm
by Anondson
Here’s the agenda that mentions the TIF request. https://www.hopkinsmn.com/AgendaCenter/ ... ?html=true

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: May 18th, 2021, 12:43 pm
by Anondson
F&C on the office-to-housing proposal for 602 units by Eagle Ridge.

https://finance-commerce.com/2021/05/ho ... kins-site/

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: June 22nd, 2021, 6:32 am
by Anondson
Alatus is picked for 325 Blake across from the Blake LRT station.

https://finance-commerce.com/2021/06/ho ... atus-plan/

14-story tower in the mix. 49 townhomes, 486 market rate, 240 affordable.

Supposedly TIF will be involved, and adding commercial.

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: June 22nd, 2021, 6:36 am
by Anondson
Biz journals has it too. https://www.bizjournals.com/twincities/ ... pment.html

This is more than I expected the site would get.

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: June 22nd, 2021, 9:11 am
by Bakken2016
Nice, love to see vacant land turn into lots of housing near LRT!

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: June 22nd, 2021, 9:40 am
by seanrichardryan
I guess I don't understand why this need any TIF.

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: June 22nd, 2021, 10:38 am
by HiawathaGuy
I guess I don't understand why this need any TIF.
The document with all the proposals from the Agenda (https://www.hopkinsmn.com/AgendaCenter/ ... ?html=true) has this information: "13.2% of total development costs identified as public as TIF and grants. Assumes award of Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) for the affordable units, which is a very competitive program."

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: June 22nd, 2021, 11:44 am
by Anondson
And total development costs would be… (copy paste)

“$239,536,566 total development cost; $309,000 per unit”

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: June 22nd, 2021, 12:08 pm
by Nick
Well, of course you’ve gotta subsidize development along the train that was built to spur development. TOD 101

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: June 30th, 2021, 11:28 am
by Anondson

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: July 1st, 2021, 1:27 pm
by Anondson
The proposal video. Better than screenshotting a pdf.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOkrlcJRd7Q

Re: Hopkins - General Topics

Posted: July 2nd, 2021, 6:22 am
by RedDutch
This is an outstanding proposal......I hope Alatus can pull it off!!!