Green Line Extension - Southwest LRT

Roads - Rails - Sidewalks - Bikeways
twincitizen
Moderator
Posts: 6377
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 7:27 pm
Location: Standish-Ericsson

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby twincitizen » May 2nd, 2016, 3:08 pm

Meh, I'd be happy to give up SWLRT in exchange for giving up all the other sprawl subsidies that are on today's draft omnibus bonding bill. YIKES it's bad.
Yeah because all those requests will just go away forever if they aren't taken care of in the 2016 bonding bill /s

Also, there's a whole lot more to the bonding bill than just the transportation section.

HiawathaGuy
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1636
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 12:03 pm

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby HiawathaGuy » May 2nd, 2016, 3:21 pm

Meh, I'd be happy to give up SWLRT in exchange for giving up all the other sprawl subsidies that are on today's draft omnibus bonding bill. YIKES it's bad.
Yeah because all those requests will just go away forever if they aren't taken care of in the 2016 bonding bill /s

Also, there's a whole lot more to the bonding bill than just the transportation section.
Agreed! Plus there's the whole needing to balance projects that will allow for a super majority from both the House & Senate. So my advice for you mattaudio; don't run for state government, as it takes compromise, for the overall better good of the state. Urban, suburban and metro.

EOst
Capella Tower
Posts: 2427
Joined: March 19th, 2014, 8:05 pm
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby EOst » May 2nd, 2016, 3:25 pm

Amazing where single-issue absolutism gets you in the end.

mattaudio
Stone Arch Bridge
Posts: 7759
Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby mattaudio » May 2nd, 2016, 3:53 pm

I'm fine seeing bonding bills and transportation bills go down in flames as long as it takes to starve the subsidized-driving beast.

HiawathaGuy
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1636
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 12:03 pm

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby HiawathaGuy » May 2nd, 2016, 4:04 pm

I'm fine seeing bonding bills and transportation bills go down in flames as long as it takes to starve the subsidized-driving beast.
But it won't... that's the problem. Until there's a very real reason for people's behaviors to change, they won't. So withholding support for a bonding bill, or letting the SWLRT "die" doesn't help anyone, if anything, it makes the short term worse - until that very real reason happens, and the inevitable costs tenfold.

David Greene
IDS Center
Posts: 4617
Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby David Greene » May 2nd, 2016, 4:05 pm

I'm fine seeing bonding bills and transportation bills go down in flames as long as it takes to starve the subsidized-driving beast.
But are you fine seeing opportunity and equity ripped away from poor families? From families of color?

mattaudio
Stone Arch Bridge
Posts: 7759
Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby mattaudio » May 2nd, 2016, 4:12 pm

Subsidized driving harms equity far more than SWLRT will ever help it. On net, the status quo fails poor people and families of color. We need the status quo to end as soon as possible.

David Greene
IDS Center
Posts: 4617
Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby David Greene » May 2nd, 2016, 4:13 pm

Easy to say when you're not the one desperately looking for work.

mattaudio
Stone Arch Bridge
Posts: 7759
Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby mattaudio » May 2nd, 2016, 4:17 pm

I'm also the one who is able to pick the geography of my employment in this job market, despite also being the one who has the ability to afford ridiculous amounts of driving in a ridiculously luxurious car if I so chose.

Personally, I'd like to see SWLRT built. But that's not the point.

MNdible
is great.
Posts: 5996
Joined: June 8th, 2012, 8:14 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby MNdible » May 2nd, 2016, 4:39 pm

Personally, I'd like to see SWLRT built. But that's not the point.
That may not be the point that you want to make, but it is in fact the point.

User avatar
Tiller
Foshay Tower
Posts: 964
Joined: January 17th, 2015, 11:58 am

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby Tiller » May 2nd, 2016, 5:12 pm

I'm fine seeing bonding bills and transportation bills go down in flames as long as it takes to starve the subsidized-driving beast.
#StrongTowns :D

Silophant
Moderator
Posts: 4476
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 4:33 pm
Location: Whimsical NE

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby Silophant » May 5th, 2016, 1:18 pm

Since this is where we were talking about it: Bonding bill falls short by one vote in the Senate.

Note that all seven senators who said they wouldn't vote for a bonding bill that didn't fund SWLRT did in fact do so.
Joey Senkyr
[email protected]

acs
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1364
Joined: March 26th, 2014, 8:41 pm

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby acs » May 5th, 2016, 2:10 pm

Just shows you how little a politician's word is really worth.

User avatar
Nick
Capella Tower
Posts: 2723
Joined: May 30th, 2012, 9:33 pm
Location: Downtown, Minneapolis

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby Nick » May 5th, 2016, 3:01 pm

It's been a rough week for ultimatum enthusiasts everywhere
Nick Magrino
[email protected]

HiawathaGuy
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1636
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 12:03 pm

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby HiawathaGuy » May 5th, 2016, 3:42 pm

Note that all seven senators who said they wouldn't vote for a bonding bill that didn't fund SWLRT did in fact do so.
Holy cowards. :roll:

Qhaberl
Foshay Tower
Posts: 855
Joined: February 25th, 2016, 9:51 am

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby Qhaberl » May 5th, 2016, 4:01 pm

I am so dam sick of politicians. I am sick of people not getting how critical it is to invest in infrastructure and economic generators.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

David Greene
IDS Center
Posts: 4617
Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby David Greene » May 5th, 2016, 4:19 pm

So now it's basically a big hella grand bargain endgame? I mean it always is but usually there are actual bills with stuff that gets horse-traded.

MNdible
is great.
Posts: 5996
Joined: June 8th, 2012, 8:14 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby MNdible » May 5th, 2016, 4:26 pm

How much do you trust Bakk? Because at this point, he's the one that's going to make this happen or not.

David Greene
IDS Center
Posts: 4617
Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby David Greene » May 5th, 2016, 4:34 pm

I trust that Bakk wants bonding. I don't trust that he cares about the metro one bit. And he certainly doesn't give a crap about transit.

Hope the Met Council and/or CTIB have some emergency funds...

phop
Landmark Center
Posts: 207
Joined: May 28th, 2013, 8:58 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)

Postby phop » May 5th, 2016, 7:47 pm

But Bakk does care about preventing a caucus mutiny, especially after last year. He knows that it's a priority for metro legislators.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests