Architecture, Development, and Infrastructure of the Twin Cities
https://urbanmsp.com/
The only downside is 3329 University Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414. It is the building across the street is a naloxene and naltrexone distribution center, which brings out the locals in the morning. Most drug rehad centers are done with daily meds around 10am, but it can be a little sketchy before that everyday.
Neither of those drugs are drugs that junkies would seek out — they both PREVENT the use of opioids. Is it also a methadone clinic? Then I could see it being sketchy.The only downside is 3329 University Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414. It is the building across the street is a naloxene and naltrexone distribution center, which brings out the locals in the morning. Most drug rehad centers are done with daily meds around 10am, but it can be a little sketchy before that everyday.
Drug addicts being drug addicts. This isn't an urgent care where you go get an x-ray for a broken finger. It is a drug clinic. Google opiod abuse if you need some examples of sketchy. I haven't seen anyone poop on anything if that helps otherwise I have see just about everything else. I don't know every single drug administered at the clinic. Most people have a court order to receive the drugs here. Drug addicts don't have any other incentive to go here other than that.The only downside is 3329 University Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414. It is the building across the street is a naloxene and naltrexone distribution center, which brings out the locals in the morning. Most drug rehad centers are done with daily meds around 10am, but it can be a little sketchy before that everyday.
Can you give more details about sketchy? What kind of behavior have you witnessed?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A bunch of houses in Prospect Park have signs stating, "We already have a tower". Super creative!Then onto the courts: Minneapolis v. PEVOWH
(Preserve Every View of the Witch's Hat)
Are we actually being prejudice against people trying to get better?Drug addicts being drug addicts. This isn't an urgent care where you go get an x-ray for a broken finger. It is a drug clinic. Google opiod abuse if you need some examples of sketchy. I haven't seen anyone poop on anything if that helps otherwise I have see just about everything else. I don't know every single drug administered at the clinic. Most people have a court order to receive the drugs here. Drug addicts don't have any other incentive to go here other than that.The only downside is 3329 University Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414. It is the building across the street is a naloxene and naltrexone distribution center, which brings out the locals in the morning. Most drug rehad centers are done with daily meds around 10am, but it can be a little sketchy before that everyday.
Can you give more details about sketchy? What kind of behavior have you witnessed?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Now they'll have two, they should be overjoyed!A bunch of houses in Prospect Park have signs stating, "We already have a tower". Super creative!Then onto the courts: Minneapolis v. PEVOWH
(Preserve Every View of the Witch's Hat)
I am not bashing the facility or individuals who use the facility. I am just stating what I observed. If you need a little bit of an eye opener stop by some morning. The clients are harmless but you will definitely get a new perspective. Addiction is a huge problem. Once the building comes in I would be willing to bet the lease will expire on the clinic or something else and they will move the center. You don't have to worry about judgments or observations anymore with the facility moved.Are we actually being prejudice against people trying to get better?Drug addicts being drug addicts. This isn't an urgent care where you go get an x-ray for a broken finger. It is a drug clinic. Google opiod abuse if you need some examples of sketchy. I haven't seen anyone poop on anything if that helps otherwise I have see just about everything else. I don't know every single drug administered at the clinic. Most people have a court order to receive the drugs here. Drug addicts don't have any other incentive to go here other than that.
Can you give more details about sketchy? What kind of behavior have you witnessed?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Art and Architecture Development. The Planning Commission approved the proposed Art & Architecture Building development by Vermilion at 3326, 3338, and 3350 University Ave SE on June 25. I heard a lot of community perspectives on this project, both for and against. I thank everyone who reached out to me and the Prospect Park Association for convening community meetings about this project. The height is one of the biggest concerns I heard about, so I was happy to see that the approved project was reduced from 17 to 14 stories (the tallest portion is functionally 13 stories but because the 1st floor exceeds 20 feet it counts as 2 stories). People are also concerned about impacts on the nearby historic water tower. In response to my request to have the Minneapolis Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) look at this project, the City Attorney’s Office informed me that the HPC lacks any authority over the project because none of the buildings proposed to be demolished have been nominated as historic structures, or even identified as potential historic structures. Still I have reached out to one of the HPC co-chairs and am waiting to hear back from him. Many people are concerned about the view from and to the tower, but it appears that the city currently has no legal basis to compel preservations of views. I will be exploring options for addressing this in the future. According to state statute, and because one extension has already been granted, the City must act on a project by September 27th. The project has been appealed to the City Council, and the appeal will be heard at the Zoning and Planning committee on July 26th. The project also requires a rezoning so will need City Council approval for that as well. The rezoning will likely be considered by the Zoning and Planning Committee on July 12th. You can find more information (under item 13) at http://www.minneapolismn.gov/meetings/p ... MSP-211939.
Without speaking to this specific project or this specific view, it's very different to suggest that there are important view corridors that should be maintained for the public benefit than it is for a specific homeowner to claim that they own a view of the skyline or something. Cities around the world (including ones like vaunted Vancouver) recognize that there's value in this. It's not crazy to imagine that there are certain specific view corridors that should be protected through municipal legislation.Ugh, the view argument. You cannot expect to preserve any view unless you own it.
