Presidential Election 2016
Re: Presidential Election 2016
I can't bring myself to vote for Hillary due to my anti-dynasty stance I've outlined before, though I'm planning to evaluate the option of writing in Tim Kaine's name for president and someone else for VP.
Mike Hicks
https://hizeph400.blogspot.com/
https://hizeph400.blogspot.com/
Re: Presidential Election 2016
It's becoming clear that many Trump supporters view Hillary the same way many of us view Trump, and it's not entirely delusion. So after watching Kaine's introduction today, I can't help but wonder what the polls would look like if his name was atop the ticket.
After the RNC the table is set for a positive, inclusive tone at the DNC, but I question whether Hillary can convince anybody not already on board.
After the RNC the table is set for a positive, inclusive tone at the DNC, but I question whether Hillary can convince anybody not already on board.
Re: Presidential Election 2016
Clinton's task is to convince those who right now say that they'll vote for Johnson to vote for her instead, because the danger of an authoritarian Putin-backed Trump is too great. It's pretty convincing to me.
Re: Presidential Election 2016
Still feelin' the Bern - - thank you very much - - , but Trump's RNC speech and Pence terrify me.
-
- Stone Arch Bridge
- Posts: 7767
- Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
- Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield
Re: Presidential Election 2016
Sure, Trump scares me a little more than Clinton. That said, I'm assuming you've all googled "Clinton Body Count" to see the dozens of Clinton associates who have mysteriously died over the last few decades?view Hillary the same way many of us view Trump, and it's not entirely delusion.
Re: Presidential Election 2016
The internet is hard sometimes, so please tell me that is sarcastic.Sure, Trump scares me a little more than Clinton. That said, I'm assuming you've all googled "Clinton Body Count" to see the dozens of Clinton associates who have mysteriously died over the last few decades?
Re: Presidential Election 2016
I'm assuming it is
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4615
- Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am
Re: Presidential Election 2016
So the DFL is trying to get Trump/Pence off the ballot because the Republicans violated state law by not selecting alternate electors at their convention.
I'm torn about this. On the one hand, I think it's important to follow the law, especially where elections are concerned and the DFL is certainly well within its rights to file a lawsuit and might even win.
On the other hand, this could blow up in their faces really badly. Nothing drives turnout like a perception that the other side is trying to "cheat" and/or "disenfranchise" voters.
This is of course not really about the presidential election but rather downballot races.
Thoughts?
I'm torn about this. On the one hand, I think it's important to follow the law, especially where elections are concerned and the DFL is certainly well within its rights to file a lawsuit and might even win.
On the other hand, this could blow up in their faces really badly. Nothing drives turnout like a perception that the other side is trying to "cheat" and/or "disenfranchise" voters.
This is of course not really about the presidential election but rather downballot races.
Thoughts?
Re: Presidential Election 2016
It.................................seems like a bad idea.
Nick Magrino
[email protected]
[email protected]
Re: Presidential Election 2016
I like the Idea of Trump/Pence not being on the ballot (and I bet the minor parties on the ballot would love it, things like the Libertarian/Green parties getting closer to federal matching funds, etc.), but we sorta really need to take back the house.
Speaking of third parties, over/under on the Libertarians and Greens (respectively) breaking 5% this year?
Speaking of third parties, over/under on the Libertarians and Greens (respectively) breaking 5% this year?
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4615
- Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am
Re: Presidential Election 2016
Is that over/under for Minnesota or the whole country?
I guess the theory is that if Trump isn't on the ballot more R's will stay home and depress turnout for the downballot races. I think it'll do the opposite, not just because it's already pissed people off but also because suddenly those downballot races are the focus of those turning out.
I guess the theory is that if Trump isn't on the ballot more R's will stay home and depress turnout for the downballot races. I think it'll do the opposite, not just because it's already pissed people off but also because suddenly those downballot races are the focus of those turning out.
-
- US Bank Plaza
- Posts: 762
- Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:30 am
Re: Presidential Election 2016
Republicans who care about the down ballot races will vote regardless. A small number of republicans turn out only in non presidential years. Trump will turn out a non zero number of white men who rarely vote. They might stay home without a presidential candidate. It'll be a net positive for the dfl in close districts out state and second ring suburbs.
Re: Presidential Election 2016
Whole country, but it can be both. I'd bet the Libertarian party does and the green party doesn't, nationally.
Re: Presidential Election 2016
Isn't Gary Johnson polling around 10 percent nationally right now?
-
- Stone Arch Bridge
- Posts: 7767
- Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
- Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield
Re: Presidential Election 2016
Seems like the legal mechanism when a major party fails to meet state law should be a fine or some other sanction, not removing a name from a ballot in a national race.
Re: Presidential Election 2016
To me, the most straightforward outcome (if the MN Supreme Court decides to do anything) would be to invalidate those ten alternate electors. That only has any damaging impact if Trump wins the state and any of the primary electors are unable to show up. It's unlikely that Trump would win Minnesota, but the court should really consider the candidates to have an equal chance of winning. If he were to win, there's a decent chance that at least one elector would be unable to do their duty, but certainly the party would work hard to ensure that as many show up as possible. It's unlikely that a missing elector or two would have any real effect on the national outcome, as much as it would cause political pundits and Veep scriptwriters to salivate at the thought.
Makes me wonder if there's still a provision in MN statutes somewhere to have the state legislature pick electors if need be.
Of course, this all points again to the fact that the Electoral College should be replaced with a more modern, proportionate, and/or direct method of voting for the president.
Makes me wonder if there's still a provision in MN statutes somewhere to have the state legislature pick electors if need be.
Of course, this all points again to the fact that the Electoral College should be replaced with a more modern, proportionate, and/or direct method of voting for the president.
Mike Hicks
https://hizeph400.blogspot.com/
https://hizeph400.blogspot.com/
Re: Presidential Election 2016
That's the only coherent theory I've heard, but I'm with you in being skeptical. Seems like almost everyone who is both motivated to vote for Trump and aware he's not on the ballot is going to go write in. The larger effect would seem to me to be the voter who is less informed and only learns that Trump's not a non-write in option when they get the ballot. That person seems likely to vote for Johnson or some other non-Hillary candidate, thus increasing the chance of a minor party getting to 5%.I guess the theory is that if Trump isn't on the ballot more R's will stay home and depress turnout for the downballot races.
Anyway, I can see the greens or Libs making this challenge, as I think they will benefit if Trump/Pence isn't there. I don't see much upside for the DFL, not least because I don't think judge is going to order Trump/Pence off the ballot when the SoS has ruled them valid just because the central committee and not the convention selected the alternate electors.
Does make the mnGOP look stupid, though.
Re: Presidential Election 2016
I've always thought the DFL figured they'd lose this, but they get to waste the GOP's time (and cash) fighting this instead of out campaigning.
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4615
- Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am
Re: Presidential Election 2016
How much is this really costing the GOP though?
Remember, it's also costing the DFL.
Remember, it's also costing the DFL.
-
- US Bank Plaza
- Posts: 762
- Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:30 am
Re: Presidential Election 2016
Dfl challenge has been dismissed. Trump will be on the ballot.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests