Bicycle Infrastructure
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
It didn't work for them, but as with anything new there is a learning time. I think that just because China didn't get it right, doesn't mean that we can't.
It will be interesting to see what happens in Seattle.
It sounds like it's not the bike share program that's a problem, it's the people.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It will be interesting to see what happens in Seattle.
It sounds like it's not the bike share program that's a problem, it's the people.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- VacantLuxuries
- Foshay Tower
- Posts: 974
- Joined: February 20th, 2015, 12:38 pm
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
That's going to be a problem no matter where schemes like this are set up. People, as a whole, suck.It sounds like it's not the bike share program that's a problem, it's the people.
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
That's going to be a problem no matter where schemes like this are set up. People, as a whole, suck.It sounds like it's not the bike share program that's a problem, it's the people.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
If you do a quick Google Search there are plenty of articles about the success of biking sharing in China. I think a dockless system might work in Minneapolis. The Nice Ride bikes are already tracked so you could do the same with a dockless system. Also Downtown where bike sharing is popular has the DID Ambassadors to help keep the bikes in correct locations. I also have noticed that lots of people don't dock their Nice Rides and instead leave them out in front of restaurant or as I saw yesterday beside them at a table at the Commons. What thing that really cool about these bikes is that there are more affordable than current bike sharing systems.
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
Are they? I thought they just track where they are docked and undocked.The Nice Ride bikes are already tracked so you could do the same with a dockless system.
I always hope those people understand that they are paying by the hour. ETA: Or half hour I guess if you don't have a membership.I also have noticed that lots of people don't dock their Nice Rides and instead leave them out in front of restaurant or as I saw yesterday beside them at a table at the Commons.
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
I think they are tracking them given that Nice Ride provides that fun animated map showing where all the bikes going around the cities. I once tried telling a couple from Europe that they should move their bikes 50 feet so they don't get charged extra while they dined. Well...that failed partially due to a language barrier.
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
Where does one find that map?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: June 3rd, 2012, 9:33 pm
- Location: Merriam Park, St. Paul
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
This might actually be it
https://www.minnpost.com/data/2012/06/d ... ride-bikes
https://www.minnpost.com/data/2012/06/d ... ride-bikes
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4672
- Joined: July 21st, 2013, 8:57 pm
- Location: Where West Minneapolis Once Was
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
Work to begin in 2018 on a multi use trail connecting Ridgedale with Minnetonka Mills, most importantly the Lake Minnetonka Regional Trail.
http://sailor.mnsun.com/2017/08/24/minn ... oad-trail/
http://sailor.mnsun.com/2017/08/24/minn ... oad-trail/
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
Work is also beginning on 94 crossing between Cedar Riverside and Downtown Mpls on Aug 28th
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
Nice Ride and Our Streets are having a conversation (with Nice Ride issuing an RFP) about dockless bike share: https://www.facebook.com/events/132580497275622/
- Mooglemuffins
- Nicollet Mall
- Posts: 145
- Joined: April 26th, 2017, 7:36 am
- Location: Longfellow
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
Have they been marking out a bunch of new 'Bike Boulevards' around Longfellow recently? I live near Hi-Lake and suddenly like...all the streets around my house have BIKE BLVD painted on them. Idk if they were blvd's before but the markings faded or if they're actually new or what.
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4672
- Joined: July 21st, 2013, 8:57 pm
- Location: Where West Minneapolis Once Was
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
Cedar Lake Regional trail crossings in SLP at Wooddale and Belt Line have long gotten articles over bicyclists-behaving-badly, now the Blake Road and 11th Ave crossings in Hopkins get their turn with an article.
http://www.startribune.com/the-drive-st ... 442639203/
I have even tried glancing in the comments.
http://www.startribune.com/the-drive-st ... 442639203/
I have even tried glancing in the comments.
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
Wait, what is the problem again?..Cedar Lake Regional trail crossings in SLP at Wooddale and Belt Line have long gotten articles over bicyclists-behaving-badly, now the Blake Road and 11th Ave crossings in Hopkins get their turn with an article.
http://www.startribune.com/the-drive-st ... 442639203/
I have even tried glancing in the comments.
the problem arises when a driver in the inside lane stops to allow a cyclist to cross, but a motorist in the outside lane who doesn’t see or expect the cyclist does not. That puts both parties on a collision course when cyclists run stop signs. Motorists have complained,
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4672
- Joined: July 21st, 2013, 8:57 pm
- Location: Where West Minneapolis Once Was
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
Complaints that mounted cyclists don’t stop at the stop signs at Blake Road and just rush across four lanes traffic. It’s almost a four lane death road, but there is a modest median for crossing.
The story misses the greater cluster f#ck around Blake Road’s trail crossing, that there is such wide spread driver miseducation around what drivers are expected to do at these trail crossings when cyclists approach to cross.
I seriously can’t wait for the coming bike trail tunnel under Blake because confused drivers make crossing Blake a nightmare.
The story misses the greater cluster f#ck around Blake Road’s trail crossing, that there is such wide spread driver miseducation around what drivers are expected to do at these trail crossings when cyclists approach to cross.
I seriously can’t wait for the coming bike trail tunnel under Blake because confused drivers make crossing Blake a nightmare.
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4617
- Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am
Re: RE: Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
Seems to me there's just as much cyclist miseducation about what cyclists are supposed to do...The story misses the greater cluster f#ck around Blake Road’s trail crossing, that there is such wide spread driver miseducation around what drivers are expected to do at these trail crossings when cyclists approach to cross.
.
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4672
- Joined: July 21st, 2013, 8:57 pm
- Location: Where West Minneapolis Once Was
Bicycle Infrastructure
Well, yeah, but the basic premise of the story is basically entirely around the cyclist miseducation. But at Blake Road, with about 10,000 cars going past the trail crossing, the quantity of confused drivers outnumbered the confused cyclists.
And at least the cyclists will have likely passed the controversial SLP Wooddale crossings with their signs saying “cyclists always stop for cars and wait”. All Blake Road drivers get are the vague “Trail Crossing” signs, as if drivers understand the difference with “Pedestrian Crossing” or legal crosswalks anymore since their drivers test.
And at least the cyclists will have likely passed the controversial SLP Wooddale crossings with their signs saying “cyclists always stop for cars and wait”. All Blake Road drivers get are the vague “Trail Crossing” signs, as if drivers understand the difference with “Pedestrian Crossing” or legal crosswalks anymore since their drivers test.
-
- Union Depot
- Posts: 321
- Joined: July 3rd, 2014, 1:38 pm
- Location: Lyndale Neighborhood
Re: Bicycle Infrastructure
I haven't ridden through here in a while. Is it still one of the small stop signs? Any cyclist that rides on trails often is pretty much trained to ignore these because of how they are normally used. They should have an actual signal with detection, but that would be rather expensive and soon to be replaced. For now, they should just put up a full size stop sign and one of the small extra signs that says "cross traffic does not stop" if they want the cyclists to be even more careful. I don't have a great recommendation for making the cars behave in a safe manner aside from the standard (narrow lanes, single lane, stop lights, etc). Intersections like this are the result of engineering failures (speaking as an engineer).
Also, the behavior described in the article as "most dangerous" (partial car stoppage) happens when cars don't do what they are supposed to. The cyclists approaching already know about the intersection and will stop if they don't think they can clear the space.
Also, the behavior described in the article as "most dangerous" (partial car stoppage) happens when cars don't do what they are supposed to. The cyclists approaching already know about the intersection and will stop if they don't think they can clear the space.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests