Future Cars: Electric and Autonomous Vehicles
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: June 1st, 2012, 8:03 am
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
A human would not have driven into a truck that was attempting into enter a loading dock. True driverless cars are 35+ years out.
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
Driverless cars are a race with a ridiculous number of runners, who have varying degrees of funding, talent, seriousness, and expertise. Unless the mistakes and accidents we see are coming from the biggest players, I wouldn't read into them too much as a read on how close the tech is to market.
Personally, I tend to think the tech actually is pretty close to market, but the social and planning consequences are poorly understood, and probably not as massive as everyone's making them out to be.
Personally, I tend to think the tech actually is pretty close to market, but the social and planning consequences are poorly understood, and probably not as massive as everyone's making them out to be.
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4615
- Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
In general terms, I think the tech is pretty close. But I wouldn't say it's close to market. It's the edge cases that will get you and it seems like we need a lot more simulation, etc. to make sure we have as many of those covered as possible.
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
something i just thought of as an electric car driver: How terrible would it be if your self-driving electric car ran out of battery on the way to pick you up? it would just be on the side of (or possibly in the middle of) a road somewhere and you'd have to go and search for it to even know where it is. (i suppose the same applies for gasoline, to a lesser extent)
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4615
- Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
Given the range of today's vehicles, by the time autoomous vehicles are widely available there will be no range issues at all and charging will likely be time-competitive to filling the gas tank.
ICE-based vehicles are rapidly losing their edge.
ICE-based vehicles are rapidly losing their edge.
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
I've gotta imagine a fully self-driving car would have a software check to prevent it from starting a trip it didn't have the range to finish.
Joey Senkyr
[email protected]
[email protected]
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
True, but it's puzzling (and concerning) that the bus was not able to take any evasive action to avoid being hit.Ha ha. Well, as it says, it was the human driver’s error (as it is in virtually every case).
-
- US Bank Plaza
- Posts: 731
- Joined: March 4th, 2016, 7:55 am
- Location: Oh, no, the burbs!
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
Do we wait until autonomous vehicles can not only drive perfectly among other autonomous vehicles, but can also perfectly avoid sleepy, drunk, sloppy, or even terroristic drivers? We will wait forever.True, but it's puzzling (and concerning) that the bus was not able to take any evasive action to avoid being hit.
Instead, ticket (or jail) the human driver who made the mistake. And get human drivers off the road ASAP.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: June 1st, 2012, 8:03 am
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
Judging by the speed at which this country has acted to remove dangerous firearms, I would say that cars driven by humans will be around for quite awhile.
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
Given the physical infrastructure across the bulk of the country, it's almost hard to disagree that taking away someone's car is akin to taking away their freedom.
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
Yeah, I agree. Lots of people will be excited about self-driving cars, but there's going to be a very, very long tail on standard cars. Some people just want to get point A to point B. Others want to do so but demand their own hermetic compartment. They're good candidates for self-driving. But there are a lot of folks who actually like driving, or who see it as an expression of their mobility and won't be comfortable giving the power of where they can or can't go over to a corporation. There's going to be a "cold, dead hands" movement, for sure.
This is part of why I don't think self-driving cars are going to be as transformative as some others say. It won't really increase road capacity or travel time (since they'll have to cope with standard cars). It will increase safety...to a point. The environmental impact of producing fewer cars is minimized by the fact that people wealthy enough to own a self-driving car won't want to share it, and people who currently bike or take transit may switch to self-driving-carsharing. And if people cared so much about getting back their commute time so they could read/work/whatever, they'd already be taking the bus.
The biggest impacts IMO are:
- Cheaper/faster replacement for taxis and local buses in sprawling, transit-poor cities like MSP
- Filling in Last Mile gaps in cities with built-up metro/commuter rail networks
- Small quality of life improvement for the wealthy
- Simpler/reduced/centralized parking in urban environments
This is part of why I don't think self-driving cars are going to be as transformative as some others say. It won't really increase road capacity or travel time (since they'll have to cope with standard cars). It will increase safety...to a point. The environmental impact of producing fewer cars is minimized by the fact that people wealthy enough to own a self-driving car won't want to share it, and people who currently bike or take transit may switch to self-driving-carsharing. And if people cared so much about getting back their commute time so they could read/work/whatever, they'd already be taking the bus.
The biggest impacts IMO are:
- Cheaper/faster replacement for taxis and local buses in sprawling, transit-poor cities like MSP
- Filling in Last Mile gaps in cities with built-up metro/commuter rail networks
- Small quality of life improvement for the wealthy
- Simpler/reduced/centralized parking in urban environments
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4677
- Joined: July 21st, 2013, 8:57 pm
- Location: Where West Minneapolis Once Was
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
That most people keep tons of their crap in cars is a big reason car ownership will be a major factor of cars for decades after self driving cars are the only type sold.
I’ve made the prediction that self-driving vans will become the default choice for affordable housing in markets like the Bay Area and LA.
I’ve made the prediction that self-driving vans will become the default choice for affordable housing in markets like the Bay Area and LA.
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
I don't think expecting an autonomous vehicle to be able to do something as simple as backing up is asking all that much. Just because the human driver was at fault does not absolve the autonomous vehicle (or rather, its engineers/programmers) of the responsibility of protecting its occupants.Do we wait until autonomous vehicles can not only drive perfectly among other autonomous vehicles, but can also perfectly avoid sleepy, drunk, sloppy, or even terroristic drivers? We will wait forever.
Instead, ticket (or jail) the human driver who made the mistake. And get human drivers off the road ASAP.
Edit: Alternately, a human bus driver in this situation could have sounded their horn to alert the truck driver. Do these vehicles not have the capability to do that?
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4615
- Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
Yes, we do! These things have algorithms configured via deep learning driven by millions of simulation cycles. They are not being intentionally programmed to react to specific situations. That is both good and bad. Good in that simulation can often catch weird edge cases and the computer can learn how to properly respond. Bad in that there is no guarantee it will find all such situations (indeed it is guaranteed not to), even situations somewhat easily anticipated by people.Do we wait until autonomous vehicles can not only drive perfectly among other autonomous vehicles, but can also perfectly avoid sleepy, drunk, sloppy, or even terroristic drivers?
These things need TONS of testing before they hit the road because algorithms can go off in very strange directions when presented with unexpected input. I don't think it's technical engineering that's holding autonomous vehicles back, it's our (proper) lack of trust in how these computers are programming themselves.
-
- US Bank Plaza
- Posts: 731
- Joined: March 4th, 2016, 7:55 am
- Location: Oh, no, the burbs!
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
Are you blaming the victim or the perpetrator?I don't think expecting an autonomous vehicle to be able to do something as simple as backing up is asking all that much. Just because the human driver was at fault does not absolve the autonomous vehicle (or rather, its engineers/programmers) of the responsibility of protecting its occupants.
Edit: Alternately, a human bus driver in this situation could have sounded their horn to alert the truck driver. Do these vehicles not have the capability to do that?
Should pedestrians wear high-visibility vests and blinking lights at night?
Should pedestrians take the blame if they get hit in a crosswalk because they’re looking at their phone?
These kinds of questions put the blame on the victim.
-
- US Bank Plaza
- Posts: 731
- Joined: March 4th, 2016, 7:55 am
- Location: Oh, no, the burbs!
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
It’s probably some of both, no?These things have algorithms configured via deep learning driven by millions of simulation cycles. They are not being intentionally programmed to react to specific situations.
Tesla has accumulated over a billion miles of data from their cars, and over 300 million miles of self-driving data, as of a year ago:
https://electrek.co/2016/11/13/tesla-au ... g-program/
Google/Waymo, Uber, etc., are collecting this data, too. Tesla’s system is constantly learning by comparing what it would do if Autopilot were on, with what the driver does with Autopilot off.
I’m not saying it’s ready today, for all situations; quite the opposite. But it does seem like it’s ripe for testing in limited situations, in ideal conditions, at low speeds, such as low-speed shuttles in defined loops, for example. People can choose to (or not) participate.
If anything, these news items are showing us just how bad human drivers are. They even crash into low-speed shuttle buses.
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4615
- Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
Oh yes, it's ready for limited road testing. I don't believe it will be ready for mass consumption for some time. I have no idea what that timeline is but I'm pretty sure it's at least 5 years out, maybe 10.
And you're right, it's probably some of both. But I suspect it's heavily biased to deep learning. It's all the rage, as the kids say.
And you're right, it's probably some of both. But I suspect it's heavily biased to deep learning. It's all the rage, as the kids say.
-
- US Bank Plaza
- Posts: 731
- Joined: March 4th, 2016, 7:55 am
- Location: Oh, no, the burbs!
Future cars / Driverless cars
Damn Millennials. They ruin everything.
[ Edit ] I’m kidding!
[ Edit ] I’m kidding!
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
Well, the victims, in this case, would be the passengers on the bus, though there were no injuries. So no, I'm not blaming them. Why would I?Are you blaming the victim or the perpetrator?
Should pedestrians wear high-visibility vests and blinking lights at night?
Should pedestrians take the blame if they get hit in a crosswalk because they’re looking at their phone?
These kinds of questions put the blame on the victim.
This is new territory in that our existing laws and concepts of motor vehicle accident fault don't take this kind of situation into account yet, but they will have to very soon. But here, I'd argue that the vehicle itself should be considered defective. So I'd blame the human driver for what they did, but also the manufacturer for designing an unsafe product.
Yes, it would be impossible to design a vehicle that could always avoid collisions, but something like this seems very avoidable.
-
- US Bank Plaza
- Posts: 731
- Joined: March 4th, 2016, 7:55 am
- Location: Oh, no, the burbs!
Re: Future cars / Driverless cars
We add safety features to cars all the time. It doesn’t mean that humans can’t drive until all the cars have these safety features. They’re a bonus, not a requirement for all current vehicles.
So, sure, add safety features to self-driving cars. It doesn’t mean they’re not ready for testing in real situations, yet. (In fact, features like backing up and honking the horn are probably software features that can be added in realtime.)
So, sure, add safety features to self-driving cars. It doesn’t mean they’re not ready for testing in real situations, yet. (In fact, features like backing up and honking the horn are probably software features that can be added in realtime.)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: DanPatchToget, mamundsen and 0 guests