Blue Line Extension - Bottineau LRT

Roads - Rails - Sidewalks - Bikeways
User avatar
angrysuburbanite
Metrodome
Posts: 93
Joined: December 31st, 2023, 4:43 pm
Location: bearpath golf course

Re: Blue Line Extension - Bottineau LRT

Postby angrysuburbanite » April 17th, 2024, 3:18 pm

"Light rail project encounters new obstacle in Minneapolis' North Loop: Major utility lines "
https://m.startribune.com/light-rail-pr ... lmob=y&c=n
"We look at it as just normal coordination [with utilities], although this one takes a little more work," said Nick Landwer, Metro Transit's director of transit system design and engineering. "We're working with the Xcel team to simplify how to get the work done. It doesn't pose an issue at all."

Project opponents were not appeased: "It's just another example of the Met Council not doing their due diligence on these projects," said Matt Bruns, who lives in the 918 Lofts along 10th Avenue, now part of the Blue Line extension route in the North Loop.
I still cannot believe some people are looking at SWLRT and BLRT as apples to apples. They are so much different from each other.

Sort of tangential, but do people really think that abolishing the Metropolitan Council is going to do anything to make LRT projects cheaper? They do realize it is a countrywide issue, right? (also, doesn't MnDOT have appointed leadership as well? How is it any different than the Met Council?)
"A developed country is not a place where the poor have cars. It's where the rich use public transportation."

Note: Many of the thoughts expressed above may be pretty stupid or ill-informed, with some rare good ideas interspersed.

Tom H.
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 629
Joined: September 4th, 2012, 5:23 am

Re: Blue Line Extension - Bottineau LRT

Postby Tom H. » April 17th, 2024, 3:25 pm

This is the second LRT article in a few weeks with a sensationalized headline, in which actual experts or project managers literally say "it's not a problem", "there's no concern", but continues to just credulously quote and both-sides the NIMBYs.

User avatar
angrysuburbanite
Metrodome
Posts: 93
Joined: December 31st, 2023, 4:43 pm
Location: bearpath golf course

Re: Blue Line Extension - Bottineau LRT

Postby angrysuburbanite » April 17th, 2024, 3:29 pm

As icing on the cake, they even mention the other "tracks in wrong location" one in this article! :roll:

Also, obligatory Star Tribune comment section sucks remark. That was worse than usual, though.
"A developed country is not a place where the poor have cars. It's where the rich use public transportation."

Note: Many of the thoughts expressed above may be pretty stupid or ill-informed, with some rare good ideas interspersed.

MNdible
is great.
Posts: 6003
Joined: June 8th, 2012, 8:14 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Blue Line Extension - Bottineau LRT

Postby MNdible » April 18th, 2024, 4:25 pm

Sort of tangential, but do people really think that abolishing the Metropolitan Council is going to do anything to make LRT projects cheaper? They do realize it is a countrywide issue, right? (also, doesn't MnDOT have appointed leadership as well? How is it any different than the Met Council?)
The primary purpose of abolishing the Met Council is to make Scott Dibble feel important.

User avatar
Nick
Capella Tower
Posts: 2728
Joined: May 30th, 2012, 9:33 pm
Location: Downtown, Minneapolis

Re: Blue Line Extension - Bottineau LRT

Postby Nick » April 18th, 2024, 4:50 pm

Yes, it is odd, given how many thousands of words have been spilled on this topic in the press, that no one has really scratched the surface on what's going on there.
Nick Magrino
[email protected]

Silophant
Moderator
Posts: 4483
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 4:33 pm
Location: Whimsical NE

Re: Blue Line Extension - Bottineau LRT

Postby Silophant » April 18th, 2024, 6:34 pm

I'm not going to hate not having both the House and Senate transportation leaders be completely beholden to the whiniest neighborhood in Minneapolis.
Joey Senkyr
[email protected]

thespeedmccool
Union Depot
Posts: 371
Joined: January 29th, 2021, 1:02 pm

Re: Blue Line Extension - Bottineau LRT

Postby thespeedmccool » April 18th, 2024, 8:52 pm

The Met Council is a nationwide model and that means it's very hard to convince DFLers to neuter or significantly change it. The GOP just wants it dead, so Dibble and Co. have to convince their fellow partisans of any changes and that's hard.

Shifting LRT construction management to MNDOT as is currently proposed is hardly a concession at all. Shifting ADA costs to Met Council and stripping their ability to spend sales tax dollars on LRT are huge concessions and should get killed.

Met Council estimated the H Line will cost over $100 million if Dibble gets his way. This anti-Met Council tirade needs to be stopped.

Afield of the topic at hand, but I can't help myself.

StandishGuy
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 140
Joined: January 29th, 2021, 4:24 pm

Re: Blue Line Extension - Bottineau LRT

Postby StandishGuy » April 19th, 2024, 12:21 pm

Meh. More than $3 billion for a route anticipated to have fewer than 15,000 daily riders? Crystal and Brooklyn Park just don't have the density and people-oriented land uses to warrant LRT. Plus, Botineau Blvd is truly awful for humans walking to proposed station locations with abismal car-oriented land uses. Things have changed so dramatically after the pandemic related to commuting and travel. patterns and planners should have recognized this fact. Geez. Target doesn't even require their workers to go intoo their offices on either end of the line. Why should we run a train all the way to a corn field in Brooklyn Park?

I'm transit dependant and live in the heart of south Minneapolis. However, bus service has been cut back so much that I can't rely on it any more as it only comes once an hour for way too much of the time. Metro Transit and area counties just need to invest in more ABRT in the short term until, hopefully, ridership returns. Too much money is being wasted on expensive rail and BRT that serves unwalkable, transit-hostile place. The Orange and Red lines suck. Northstar sucks. The Gold and Green Lines will suck because they go to low-density, auto-oriented places, and nothing about those places is going to change.

I am a transit dependent person who is very supportive of investing in


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests