Perhaps then there'll be transit that serves where people, who actually do depend on transit, actually live instead of bypassing them.
Is that snark *really* necessary? This is the last I'll say on the subject.
Snark? I strongly believe this is the situation. Disagreeing is now 'disparaging?'
Recall you came on accusing opponents of being racists. That so endeared me to you.
This is the last I'll say on the subject.
That's a promise?
http://peanutbutterjellytime.net/peanut ... y-time.gif
Over at the discussion on the transit line that should actually go through North Mpls, most people agree with you that it's a shame we're bypassing most of the residents of North Mpls in favor of the backside of a golf course:
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=7
This is another one that's more complicated than it seems. The residents in North were split 50/50 over the alignment. I for one am not comfortable tearing down hundreds of houses without a clear community mandate.
WHEN has government actually bothered to worry about what residents think????
Something about a stadium and referendum
And now it's 'If you put a train, trolley, aBRT, stagecoach thru North, we're, we're going to, to have to, um, tear down hundreds of houses!! There's just no other way!
Again it's not 3A, 3C or any other alignment- It's the line itself.