LRT Disappointments
Re: LRT Disappointments
I think the new diverging diamond interchange at I-494 also slowed down the Blue Line, at least for a while. My most recent ride through there seemed to go more quickly than previous trips through it, but I may have randomly hit it at a good time (or maybe my previous trips through there had been at random bad times).
Mike Hicks
https://hizeph400.blogspot.com/
https://hizeph400.blogspot.com/
Re: LRT Disappointments
Anyone have a resource/link as to the point of a divergent diamond? I have used that intersection on bike, car and LRT and found the experience to be universally worse, especially on bike. Or is the answer simply slight better for peak demand car traffic?
-
- Stone Arch Bridge
- Posts: 7761
- Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
- Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield
Re: LRT Disappointments
Here's some discussion regarding the interchange elsewhere in the TPO forum:
https://forum.streets.mn/viewtopic.php?f=18& ... 724#p37724 "Street, Road, and Highway Projects"
The purpose of a diverging diamond is to facilitate greater automobile capacity between a freeway and a stroad when there's significant turning volume onto and off of the freeway (there usually is). In a standard DDI, there are two signal phases at each end of the interchange, as opposed to 3+ at a traditional interchange.
Opinion: It shocks me that we allowed this DDI to move forward in a way that made the Blue Line worse. It's almost as bad as the TED grant from DEED that paid for it: http://mn.gov/deed/government/financial ... ng/ted.jsp
Apparently economic development would be stifled without spending millions redoing a perfectly fine interchange.
It's also shameful how bad bike and walk connectivity is at 34th Ave across 494. I seem to remember David Levinson or someone else posting an image of this project noting the bike/walk deficiencies, but I can't find it. This interchange creates an even more severe barrier for development north of 494 (Ft. Snelling Cemetery and airline facilities (DL Building C / regional airlines HQ, DL Cargo, etc.) from the American Blvd LRT station. Not to mention that 34th Avenue is the "approved" bicycle approach to MSP (you'll get tazed/arrested if you bike the Terminal 1 access road). Finally, I'm not sure how further stroadification helps Bloomington create a valuable "South Loop District."
https://forum.streets.mn/viewtopic.php?f=18& ... 724#p37724 "Street, Road, and Highway Projects"
The purpose of a diverging diamond is to facilitate greater automobile capacity between a freeway and a stroad when there's significant turning volume onto and off of the freeway (there usually is). In a standard DDI, there are two signal phases at each end of the interchange, as opposed to 3+ at a traditional interchange.
Opinion: It shocks me that we allowed this DDI to move forward in a way that made the Blue Line worse. It's almost as bad as the TED grant from DEED that paid for it: http://mn.gov/deed/government/financial ... ng/ted.jsp
Apparently economic development would be stifled without spending millions redoing a perfectly fine interchange.
It's also shameful how bad bike and walk connectivity is at 34th Ave across 494. I seem to remember David Levinson or someone else posting an image of this project noting the bike/walk deficiencies, but I can't find it. This interchange creates an even more severe barrier for development north of 494 (Ft. Snelling Cemetery and airline facilities (DL Building C / regional airlines HQ, DL Cargo, etc.) from the American Blvd LRT station. Not to mention that 34th Avenue is the "approved" bicycle approach to MSP (you'll get tazed/arrested if you bike the Terminal 1 access road). Finally, I'm not sure how further stroadification helps Bloomington create a valuable "South Loop District."
-
- Nicollet Mall
- Posts: 193
- Joined: August 20th, 2012, 9:53 pm
Re: LRT Disappointments
I was really disappointed to find out that my Metro Transit magnetic pass with a stored value does not work at the TVM's. Whenever I am taking the Blue line south it is not that big of a deal since I took a bus first and get the transfer. It is once I am heading back north that I feel bad since I "didn't" pay to board the train. I only pay once I transfer back to my local bus. So it isn't like I am stealing a free ride. I talked to a MTPD officer about it at the MOA and he said don't worry about it. I do worry that one day I am going to come across one that does have a Napoleon complex.
- FISHMANPET
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4233
- Joined: June 6th, 2012, 2:19 pm
- Location: Corcoran
Re: LRT Disappointments
Best get yourself a Go-To card, and fast. I'd bet if you really cared you could take that store value pass and have it put on a Go-To card.
As far as I know, the only objection to ditching the paper passes for the Go-To card is that some communities don't have access to the credit cards necessary to keep one loaded, but now you can go to a corner store and buy a paper Go-To card good for 10 rides, so I don't see a problem.
Basically, get yourself a Go-to card.
As far as I know, the only objection to ditching the paper passes for the Go-To card is that some communities don't have access to the credit cards necessary to keep one loaded, but now you can go to a corner store and buy a paper Go-To card good for 10 rides, so I don't see a problem.
Basically, get yourself a Go-to card.
Re: LRT Disappointments
You can add value with cash! Yes, everyone should have a Go-To card.
Nick Magrino
[email protected]
[email protected]
-
- Nicollet Mall
- Posts: 193
- Joined: August 20th, 2012, 9:53 pm
Re: LRT Disappointments
I tried to transfer the remaining balance onto a GO pass. I was told that in order to do that my pass had to have the full value on it.
- LRV Op Dude
- Union Depot
- Posts: 328
- Joined: July 7th, 2012, 10:30 am
- Contact:
Re: LRT Disappointments
I tried to transfer the remaining balance onto a GO pass. I was told that in order to do that my pass had to have the full value on it.
Not sure who told you that but try going to a Metro Transit Service Center. Maybe you should give Customer Relations first at 612-373-3333.
Blog: Old-Twin Cities Transit New-Twin Cities Transit
You Tube: Old, New
AKA: Bus Driver Dude
You Tube: Old, New
AKA: Bus Driver Dude
-
- Target Field
- Posts: 513
- Joined: January 30th, 2014, 9:03 am
Re: LRT Disappointments
I was nicely surprised today! I heard an automated announcement for a blue line train arriving in two minutes, and then an announcement that the train was arriving on track 1 when it arrived. There was still no time listed on the NexTrip displays, but I'm sure that's on its way. Great to see it rolling out.
i talk too much. web dev, downtown. admin @ tower.ly
Re: LRT Disappointments
That's great! Make sure we're reporting that kind of stuff!
-
- Target Field
- Posts: 513
- Joined: January 30th, 2014, 9:03 am
Re: LRT Disappointments
I know this thread was started about inconsistent timing and incorrect signage, but I just witnessed a situation where an older woman had to use the emergency call button on the train and it did not work. Whether it wasn't functioning or went unanswered, I'm not sure. Passengers were getting involved and the situation was going on for at least three different stops before I reached mine.
I've followed up with MetroTransit with the car number. But, jeeze... I'm happy the situation wasn't anything more severe.
I've followed up with MetroTransit with the car number. But, jeeze... I'm happy the situation wasn't anything more severe.
i talk too much. web dev, downtown. admin @ tower.ly
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: July 21st, 2013, 8:57 pm
- Location: Where West Minneapolis Once Was
Re: LRT Disappointments
Whoa. That's absolutely disappointing.
-
- Target Field
- Posts: 513
- Joined: January 30th, 2014, 9:03 am
Re: LRT Disappointments
They haven't responded to me about it, either.Whoa. That's absolutely disappointing.
i talk too much. web dev, downtown. admin @ tower.ly
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests