RBC Gateway & Four Seasons - 37 stories - 519'

Downtown - North Loop - Mill District - Elliot Park - Loring Park
Wedgeguy
Capella Tower
Posts: 3403
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 6:59 am

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Wedgeguy » December 14th, 2014, 8:46 am

This thing looks WAY out of proportion.
Let's remember that the IDS was considered the same when it was first proposed and especially after it was first completed. Only when more taller towers were completed did it look less out of place.

nate
Landmark Center
Posts: 283
Joined: February 26th, 2013, 2:01 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby nate » December 14th, 2014, 10:05 am

IF the Duval proposal is for real and it gets built in a non-watered down fashion, then I don't see any way it isn't the clear winner. I love everything about the tower: it's skinny profile, the way it transitions seamlessly to a lighted crown, and it's skyline presence. It's a beautiful piece of architecture from an ambitious developer and a top-notch designer. MOAR PLZ.

User avatar
Michael
City Center
Posts: 40
Joined: May 6th, 2014, 4:15 pm
Location: Downtown Minneapolis
Contact:

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Michael » December 14th, 2014, 3:09 pm

Lot of good comments.

My thoughts about the Duval:

As someone doing 90% of my living/working downtown, the lack of park space doesn't really bother me given the development of the green space by the Stadium/Downtown East, the proposed Waterworks and existing green space along the river, and some of the preexisting spaces, there is actually going to be some positive development in this regard anyway.

As for positioning, again, I don't see it as being "too far away" from the taller buildings in the downtown core, especially given the proposal is residential/hotel in nature. I do think it has great potential to drive some interesting infill proposals between the core and the riverfront, which if you go back to the phrases "gateway" and "iconic", is exactly what you would think Minneapolis should want.

For me, if they have the financing and can make a commitment to build in a reasonable time-frame, the Duval proposal should be a no-brainer.

nickmgray
Union Depot
Posts: 319
Joined: July 3rd, 2012, 10:40 am

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby nickmgray » December 14th, 2014, 3:45 pm

The idea of the Duval proposal may seem outlandish, but if you think of all the different components that they have proposed, it's really just three medium developments wrapped up into one. We have not seen the square footage for the proposed office portion of the project, but it can't be more than what's supposedly being worked on for the TCF block.

I could care less about the lack of park or external public space. We have public space right across the street and the river is just two blocks away. I think the atrium in the one piece of this project which will make or break it. If they are proposing something that will be a retail center like the Crystal Court at the IDS, it'll surely get a positive reaction from the public and the committee reviewing the proposals. With any of these proposals, this area will have the highers residential density in all of Minneapolis and will naturally support more retail.

Wedgeguy
Capella Tower
Posts: 3403
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 6:59 am

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Wedgeguy » December 14th, 2014, 4:33 pm

There is more green space in this city that is not being used wisely. There is land in front of the Voya Building facing Hennepin that should be USED as a park and not just grass that gets mowed. There is a good half block piece of land there where there is no benches, paths, or other public amenities. Let's do something productive with that land before we gripe that there is not a park in town. Let's see Peavey Plaza actual work as a park before we waste tax dollars on something that will not live up to expectations like the two I've just mentioned.

John
Capella Tower
Posts: 2102
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 2:06 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby John » December 14th, 2014, 4:44 pm

It will be interesting to hear more details about Duval's proposal and how its going to work out for such a tall building. Having three uses in one tower is complicated and I doubt most local developers would ever want to touch that. According to the media, Duval has international experience and I would bet he has previous experience with this type of project. It's in such a different league than what we're used to on the prairie, so perhaps that's why some people may be skeptical of his credibility.

I also agree with the comments for no further need of large, new public spaces downtown. We are getting a huge park by the stadium. The renovated Nicollet Mall will be green enough for this part of town. Focus on renovating the existing Peavey Plaza. We need more brick and mortar density.

Minneboy
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 669
Joined: January 15th, 2013, 1:18 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Minneboy » December 14th, 2014, 4:44 pm

I'm wondering how Duvals would look if the tower was turned 90 degrees instead of following the street grid.

bugmenot
Block E
Posts: 1
Joined: January 15th, 2013, 10:25 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby bugmenot » December 14th, 2014, 8:37 pm

Minneboy - you meant 45 degrees I assume.

Minneboy
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 669
Joined: January 15th, 2013, 1:18 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Minneboy » December 14th, 2014, 9:05 pm

You're right lol

User avatar
Nathan
Capella Tower
Posts: 3694
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:42 am

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Nathan » December 15th, 2014, 10:45 am

Wouldn't we want an interesting tallest? I mean there is something to say about minimalist beauty, but this thing is just a square right? With a flat square light up crown? That doesn't really do our skyline any justice. Just a square tube sticking out of the ground. I'm not eager to bite at the first tall tower proposed, there will be more in our day.

Seth
Metrodome
Posts: 69
Joined: June 11th, 2012, 8:18 am
Location: Brooklyn

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Seth » December 15th, 2014, 10:51 am

I think it's important to keep in mind that all of these proposals are fairly preliminary and whichever one is selected would go through some refinements. Doesn't necessarily mean drastic changes, but some I'm sure.

User avatar
Nathan
Capella Tower
Posts: 3694
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:42 am

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Nathan » December 15th, 2014, 11:01 am

While that's true, essentially what Duval is doing is throwing the cheapest shortest tall building he could build at Minnesota and hoping that just the height will be enough to wow the fly over country. There's no curves, no facets, no angles, no arches. Seattle would still have a building taller and better looking than this. It's not an icon, and it's not good enough for a city that values architectural creativity and innovation.

m b p
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 195
Joined: September 3rd, 2012, 5:46 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby m b p » December 15th, 2014, 11:12 am

While that's true, essentially what Duval is doing is throwing the cheapest shortest tall building he could build at Minnesota and hoping that just the height will be enough to wow the fly over country. There's no curves, no facets, no angles, no arches. Seattle would still have a building taller and better looking than this. It's not an icon, and it's not good enough for a city that values architectural creativity and innovation.
I don't think it looks cheap. It does looks simple. Many are ignoring the use of cutouts/negative space on the tower... and saying it's just a square that rises straight up. I disagree with that as well.

Keep in mind it's primarily a hotel/residential tower. It can't really be more substantial.

To each there own though.
Last edited by m b p on December 15th, 2014, 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

LakeCharles
Foshay Tower
Posts: 898
Joined: January 16th, 2014, 8:34 am
Location: Kingfield

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby LakeCharles » December 15th, 2014, 11:13 am

So we should select a shorter one? Why? If another, better supertall is in the near distant future, it will still happen, and then we'll have two.

User avatar
Nathan
Capella Tower
Posts: 3694
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:42 am

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Nathan » December 15th, 2014, 11:22 am

While that's true, essentially what Duval is doing is throwing the cheapest shortest tall building he could build at Minnesota and hoping that just the height will be enough to wow the fly over country. There's no curves, no facets, no angles, no arches. Seattle would still have a building taller and better looking than this. It's not an icon, and it's not good enough for a city that values architectural creativity and innovation.
I don't think it looks cheap. It does looks simple. Many are ignoring the use of cutouts/negative space on the tower... and saying it's just a square that rises straight up. I disagree with that as well.

Keep in mind it's primarily a hotel/residential tower. It can't really be more substantial.

To each there own though.
It can't be more substantial!? Clearly you haven't seen a lot of other tall buildings. On the extreme spectrum frank gehry new York. Clearly apartments don't have to be a box.

I'm glad you are wooed. But I'm not impressed by the cut outs. I think dubai has 8 of this building.

Seth
Metrodome
Posts: 69
Joined: June 11th, 2012, 8:18 am
Location: Brooklyn

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Seth » December 15th, 2014, 11:22 am

While that's true, essentially what Duval is doing is throwing the cheapest shortest tall building he could build at Minnesota and hoping that just the height will be enough to wow the fly over country. There's no curves, no facets, no angles, no arches. Seattle would still have a building taller and better looking than this. It's not an icon, and it's not good enough for a city that values architectural creativity and innovation.
Totally - just for the record I think it's a great building, and wouldn't be disappointed if it were built as is, but for a new tallest I'm not blown away. I was hoping that when we saw the side fronting Wash & Henn there would be something a bit more inspired, but the night rendering from the Plymouth bridge has sort of squashed that hope...for the time being anyway.

User avatar
Nathan
Capella Tower
Posts: 3694
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:42 am

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Nathan » December 15th, 2014, 11:23 am

So we should select a shorter one? Why? If another, better supertall is in the near distant future, it will still happen, and then we'll have two.
If you think every proposal floating around for a tall building right now is going to get built irregardless to others getting built you have a very skewed perception of demand. And build a shorter one because it steps up from the river nicely, it's beautiful and iconic, it serves the city and street scape well, I could go on.

LakeCharles
Foshay Tower
Posts: 898
Joined: January 16th, 2014, 8:34 am
Location: Kingfield

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby LakeCharles » December 15th, 2014, 11:39 am

If there is a great clamoring for building supertalls in our city, one quarter block 70 story building will not quash that. Or to put it another way, if this building scares off all developers from building tall buildings in our city then there was not a great demand to build them in the first place.

And this building can serve the streetscape well. The city can demand that it does.

Minneboy
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 669
Joined: January 15th, 2013, 1:18 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Minneboy » December 15th, 2014, 11:42 am

I like it just fine. I think it's beautiful in its simplicity. Sort of like the WTC was but perhaps even more so but alas not as tall.

At some point there will be newer and taller towers. No cities are stagnant forever. Though some seem to be.

There I've made me views known and I'm not going to beat anyone over the head with it be repeating myself over and over.

aeisenberg
Landmark Center
Posts: 269
Joined: June 12th, 2012, 7:45 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby aeisenberg » December 15th, 2014, 11:49 am

Wouldn't we want an interesting tallest? I mean there is something to say about minimalist beauty, but this thing is just a square right? With a flat square light up crown? That doesn't really do our skyline any justice. Just a square tube sticking out of the ground. I'm not eager to bite at the first tall tower proposed, there will be more in our day.
-1
Aaron Eisenberg / Realtor, Keller Williams Integrity
612.568.5828 / [email protected] / 1350 Lagoon Ave #900
http://www.agentaaron.com


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests