LPM Apartments - (376' - 36 Stories)

Downtown - North Loop - Mill District - Elliot Park - Loring Park
PhilmerPhil
Moderator
Posts: 1064
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 11:38 am
Location: SOUP: SOuth UPtown

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby PhilmerPhil » August 3rd, 2012, 2:55 pm

I was by there last night too and there was some sort of a truck parked in the lot... I forget what kind or what it said on it though.

minneapolisguy
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 104
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 5:03 pm

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby minneapolisguy » August 4th, 2012, 1:26 pm

The Braun Intertec people were there yesterday afternoon -

Image

PhilmerPhil
Moderator
Posts: 1064
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 11:38 am
Location: SOUP: SOuth UPtown

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby PhilmerPhil » August 4th, 2012, 2:29 pm

Did you ask them about what the progress on this development is?!?!

minneapolisguy
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 104
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 5:03 pm

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby minneapolisguy » August 4th, 2012, 3:00 pm

No I did not - was just biking by and took a quick snapshot.

User avatar
Nick
Capella Tower
Posts: 2734
Joined: May 30th, 2012, 9:33 pm
Location: Downtown, Minneapolis

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby Nick » August 4th, 2012, 4:20 pm

Two drill trucks were there this afternoon, but no one was around to talk to.
Nick Magrino
[email protected]

minneapolisguy
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 104
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 5:03 pm

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby minneapolisguy » August 4th, 2012, 5:02 pm

There were two on Friday - I just took a photo of the one.

John
Capella Tower
Posts: 2102
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 2:06 pm

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby John » August 4th, 2012, 5:53 pm

Is there anyone still parking in the lot? I'm pretty confident this project will happen. It's an apartment project that outshines all the other ones combined. The architecture of 1368 Lasalle makes all the other apartments going up look like they were built for a trailer park! The day they start digging out this terrible parking lot I'm going to open up a bottle of champagne to celebrate :P

TroyGBiv
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 659
Joined: July 6th, 2012, 10:33 pm

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby TroyGBiv » August 5th, 2012, 1:53 am

Drilling core samples is the most preliminary work before they determine footings and begin excavation. They have to determine at what level the bedrock is and or whether there are different sedimentary levels that might impact the foundation design. I think that this all points to the project going forward - plus the Startribune has an article about how developers and investors are moving back into this market.

ECtransplant
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 710
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 9:56 am

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby ECtransplant » August 5th, 2012, 1:52 pm

Drilling core samples is the most preliminary work before they determine footings and begin excavation. They have to determine at what level the bedrock is and or whether there are different sedimentary levels that might impact the foundation design. I think that this all points to the project going forward - plus the Startribune has an article about how developers and investors are moving back into this market.
What's the typical time frame from core samples to excavation work beginning?

min-chi-cbus
Capella Tower
Posts: 2869
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 9:19 am

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby min-chi-cbus » August 5th, 2012, 2:58 pm

Drilling core samples is the most preliminary work before they determine footings and begin excavation. They have to determine at what level the bedrock is and or whether there are different sedimentary levels that might impact the foundation design. I think that this all points to the project going forward - plus the Startribune has an article about how developers and investors are moving back into this market.
Could you provide a link to that article? I didn't see it today.

TroyGBiv
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 659
Joined: July 6th, 2012, 10:33 pm

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby TroyGBiv » August 5th, 2012, 5:45 pm


EquipmentImages
Block E
Posts: 6
Joined: July 26th, 2012, 6:41 pm

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby EquipmentImages » August 5th, 2012, 8:44 pm

Drilling core samples is the most preliminary work before they determine footings and begin excavation. They have to determine at what level the bedrock is and or whether there are different sedimentary levels that might impact the foundation design. I think that this all points to the project going forward - plus the Startribune has an article about how developers and investors are moving back into this market.
What's the typical time frame from core samples to excavation work beginning?
It could be a month, it could be a year...or never. There really is no time frame.

But just because round two of drilling has begun it should not be taken as an indication that the project is remotely moving towards the excavation/foundation stage. Who's to say that the underground conditions can even support a small footprint 36 story tower in that part of the city? Who's to say full or partial project funding is there or coming? This will take a long while yet.

User avatar
Nick
Capella Tower
Posts: 2734
Joined: May 30th, 2012, 9:33 pm
Location: Downtown, Minneapolis

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby Nick » August 5th, 2012, 9:03 pm

Drilling core samples is the most preliminary work before they determine footings and begin excavation. They have to determine at what level the bedrock is and or whether there are different sedimentary levels that might impact the foundation design. I think that this all points to the project going forward - plus the Startribune has an article about how developers and investors are moving back into this market.
What's the typical time frame from core samples to excavation work beginning?
It could be a month, it could be a year...or never. There really is no time frame.

But just because round two of drilling has begun it should not be taken as an indication that the project is remotely moving towards the excavation/foundation stage. Who's to say that the underground conditions can even support a small footprint 36 story tower in that part of the city? Who's to say full or partial project funding is there or coming? This will take a long while yet.
As someone who got a solid B in Geology 1001 freshman year of college, I would hypothesize that similarly-sized buildings a couple blocks away from this site would bode well for the ability of the ground to support the building.
Nick Magrino
[email protected]

min-chi-cbus
Capella Tower
Posts: 2869
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 9:19 am

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby min-chi-cbus » August 6th, 2012, 8:59 am

^That, and the fact that downtown sits above a large limestone deposit, which is partly why a subway in Minneapolis is going to be nothing more than a pipe dream unless real estate values skyrocket high enough to make such a project financially feasible!

Konante
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 173
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 9:17 am
Location: Warehouse District

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby Konante » August 6th, 2012, 9:05 am

But just because round two of drilling has begun it should not be taken as an indication that the project is remotely moving towards the excavation/foundation stage. Who's to say that the underground conditions can even support a small footprint 36 story tower in that part of the city?
I accept your point but I would hope such tests at this stage are confirmatory, not exploratory. I *hope* I'm wrong in doubting that all of the time that went into planning and developing this tower occurred without knowing if the parcel was suitable.

min-chi-cbus
Capella Tower
Posts: 2869
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 9:19 am

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby min-chi-cbus » August 6th, 2012, 9:11 am

But just because round two of drilling has begun it should not be taken as an indication that the project is remotely moving towards the excavation/foundation stage. Who's to say that the underground conditions can even support a small footprint 36 story tower in that part of the city?
I accept your point but I would hope such tests at this stage are confirmatory, not exploratory. I *hope* I'm wrong in doubting that all of the time that went into planning and developing this tower occurred without knowing if the parcel was suitable.
Agreed....it wouldn't make very much sense. I assume EquipmentImages knows something about the industry first-hand and take the info at face value, but it doesn't seem the most logical way to do business to me.

spearson
Landmark Center
Posts: 291
Joined: July 9th, 2012, 2:29 pm

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby spearson » August 6th, 2012, 10:27 am

^That, and the fact that downtown sits above a large limestone deposit, which is partly why a subway in Minneapolis is going to be nothing more than a pipe dream unless real estate values skyrocket high enough to make such a project financially feasible!
I think the limestone layer is mostly ignored when it comes to underground infrastructure in favor of carving into the softer sandstone layer beneath it. If a subway system was ever deemed necessary in Minneapolis, I would assume it would most likely reside there.

User avatar
Andrew_F
Rice Park
Posts: 407
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 10:15 pm
Location: Stevens Square

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby Andrew_F » August 7th, 2012, 5:56 am

Depends on how it's built. If it's drilled-- yes, our Saint Peter is great for subways and other tunnels. Cut and cover-- not so much.

Tcmetro
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1779
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 8:02 pm
Location: Chicago (ex-Minneapolitan)

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby Tcmetro » August 7th, 2012, 8:13 am

Stations would certainly be expensive, then. I would imagine stop spacing would be in the 1 mile plus range.

User avatar
woofner
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1241
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:04 am

Re: 1368 LaSalle Ave development

Postby woofner » August 7th, 2012, 10:22 am

MN Reflections has several bedrock geology maps of the Twin Cities, for example:

http://reflections.mndigital.org/cdm/si ... 1160/rec/5

Most of the central cities has the limestone layer - known as Platteville or Platteville/Glenwood, it's about 25-35 feet thick - over the sandstone layer. A notable exception is Uptown. The deep bored tunnel under the airport went through the limestone formation - I'm assuming into the St Peter sandstone but I haven't been able to confirm that. It was a bit over a mile long, included one station, and cost $120m. That's about five times cheaper than Seattle's LRT tunnel, without factoring stations or inflation.

Of course, they still need to do core samples for buildings because the underlying geology can vary quite a bit within the larger topography.
"Who rescued whom!"


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests