Page 7 of 17

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: December 6th, 2012, 1:46 pm
by min-chi-cbus
That's a good point, I remember 12 floors as well, but the drawings did change and I bet the latest renderings/height is most accurate -- although I count over 10 floors myself. But I'd also appreciate confirmation on that. I'll try checking his website to see if details are available. I mean, this thing is under construction now, no?

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: December 6th, 2012, 2:18 pm
by mnmike
Yes, the most recent renderings show 12...but like I say, I have read both. Site work is underway, and Stanton recently said in an article that "construction" would start within 10 days.

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: December 6th, 2012, 2:44 pm
by MillCityTimes
The latest word is 12 floors & 169 units.

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: December 30th, 2012, 7:04 pm
by Nick
I wish there was an updated rendering for this. It looks like the footprint is going to be really big. I hope it turns out as well as 36 Park in SLP.

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: December 31st, 2012, 6:47 pm
by min-chi-cbus
I think it will turn out quite a bit BETTER than 36 Park in SLP! This is my #2 or #3 favorite project, in both concept and design (potential -- it could also be butt ugly).

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: December 31st, 2012, 7:53 pm
by Andrew_F
The large footprint is likely for a big parking base, no?

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: December 31st, 2012, 9:17 pm
by MillCityTimes
The large footprint is likely for a big parking base, no?
Parking is underground for this project...

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: December 31st, 2012, 11:00 pm
by Andrew_F
Apologies that I had a question about something not directly discussed in the thread.

Thanks for responding though. I guess I'll do more due diligence and keep questions to myself in the future.

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: January 1st, 2013, 4:42 am
by stock345
It may seem like something obvious, but I wouldn't say not to ask questions if you honestly have them.

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: January 1st, 2013, 6:30 pm
by min-chi-cbus
It may seem like something obvious, but I wouldn't say not to ask questions if you honestly have them.
But if it's an extremely stupid question......

JK, I thought it was relevant. :D

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: January 2nd, 2013, 2:45 am
by stock345
Lol I fully understand where you're coming from. :)

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: January 29th, 2013, 11:42 pm
by seanrichardryan
Sunday 27th- Izzy's factory in the foreground Image

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: January 30th, 2013, 12:39 am
by Nathan
It's such a pretty crane! Looks awesome from 94.

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: January 30th, 2013, 11:02 am
by mnmike
Very nice. What is taking so long with 1368 I wonder? They must be going about things differently...as this and The Nic started much later.

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: January 30th, 2013, 12:10 pm
by beykite
Well 1368 is 26 stories taller then this. That probably has something to do with it. But it does seem like this is moving pretty fast, especially if they expect occupancy in 15 months.

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: January 30th, 2013, 12:32 pm
by MNdible
Because it's shorter, the foundation loads at Stonebridge will be much less, and it's located in an area with better soils. I haven't been over there to look in person, but I'd guess that they're using regular concrete spread footings, while 1368 is having to use deep caissons.

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: January 30th, 2013, 12:40 pm
by mnmike
Yeah, sounds like they may be putting up the 1368 one today...but The Nic's(which isn't THAT much shorter) also went up very fast, that's why I was wondering.

It looks like the height will be 146 feet? Just about 35 feet taller than The Bridgewater...so fairly significant for this area.

From:
http://en.phorio.com/

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: January 30th, 2013, 3:29 pm
by beykite
This view sure will be different

Image


(side note phorio is awesome)

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: January 31st, 2013, 7:44 am
by min-chi-cbus
Yeah, sounds like they may be putting up the 1368 one today...but The Nic's(which isn't THAT much shorter) also went up very fast, that's why I was wondering.

It looks like the height will be 146 feet? Just about 35 feet taller than The Bridgewater...so fairly significant for this area.

From:
http://en.phorio.com/
Oh wow, so a little under half the size of 1368 LaSalle and about half the size of the Nic? It certainly will set a worthy precedent for being the first/last thing you see when entering/leaving downtown via Washington Ave!

Re: StoneBridge (2nd Street South & 11th Avenue South)

Posted: January 31st, 2013, 11:41 am
by Nick
Walking across the Hennepin Avenue bridge yesterday, I noticed this crane has a cool blinky light on it that kinda fades in and out. Looks futuristic :). For whatever reason, I also like the look of the flat top cranes vs. the ones with the boom on top.