Absolutely.If anything I think there's more to indict about the concept of an entertainment district than the concept of parking-protected bike lanes.
Downtown Minneapolis - News & General Topics
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
-
- Foshay Tower
- Posts: 913
- Joined: November 17th, 2012, 6:53 pm
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
You are probably thinking of the Minneapolis 360 proposal for those parking lots. A rendering is in the link. The residential is to the left on the Ramada lot I believe.I think that was the block that Ellerbe designed that 1,000 foot "Gateway Tower" for back in 2006? 2007? There never was a tenant for it and there never was a developer announcement... but I always thought it was Ellerbe trying to draw attention to their capabilities and major structures that they built in China and the Middle East... I'll see if I can find that article and rendering.
http://www.archfieldoffice.com/architec ... t-of-view/
- Sacrelicio
- Union Depot
- Posts: 364
- Joined: November 11th, 2015, 6:38 pm
- Location: Field
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
Seconded. But hey, gotta have areas downtown where people who don't live downtown can go completely buck wild and make it unappealing for any other kind of business or city dweller.Absolutely.If anything I think there's more to indict about the concept of an entertainment district than the concept of parking-protected bike lanes.
- VacantLuxuries
- Foshay Tower
- Posts: 973
- Joined: February 20th, 2015, 12:38 pm
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
Couldn't they just settle for a Cowboy Jacks in Maple Grove?But hey, gotta have areas downtown where people who don't live downtown can go completely buck wild and make it unappealing for any other kind of business or city dweller.
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
But we're not talking about concepts. We're talking about the actual, as executed, parking protected bike lanes. And in their actual built form, they are weird, poorly executed, poorly understood, thinly used, and not terribly beneficial to bikers.If anything I think there's more to indict about the concept of an entertainment district than the concept of parking-protected bike lanes.
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
Sure. But going from that (which even the Minneapolis Bike Coalition agrees on) to the premise of Anselmo's article isn't just a leap, it's a somersault.But we're not talking about concepts. We're talking about the actual, as executed, parking protected bike lanes. And in their actual built form, they are weird, poorly executed, poorly understood, thinly used, and not terribly beneficial to bikers.
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
They are also not at all a factor in what ails entertainment businesses along First Avenue.But we're not talking about concepts. We're talking about the actual, as executed, parking protected bike lanes. And in their actual built form, they are weird, poorly executed, poorly understood, thinly used, and not terribly beneficial to bikers.
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
I'll broadly agree with that, and Anslemo always has an axe to grind, it seems. But I think we'd also agree that a functional parking/bike lane configuration would be beneficial to a commercial node.
-
- Stone Arch Bridge
- Posts: 7760
- Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
- Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
It seems rather straightforward to me. If anything is confusing about them, it's the fact that the outer lanes are driving lanes at some hours and parking lanes at other hours. That is a recipe for low/poor use by everyone, regardless of bicycle lanes on the outside. Easy solution: Make them parking lanes at all hours of the day, and install curb extensions at the beginning of the block. Boom, you've instantly communicated that it's a parking lane and not a travel lane, and you've communicated exactly where that lane is relative to the bicycle lane. http://nacto.org/publication/urban-stre ... xtensions/
- Sacrelicio
- Union Depot
- Posts: 364
- Joined: November 11th, 2015, 6:38 pm
- Location: Field
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
Bike and crime sewer!Sure. But going from that (which even the Minneapolis Bike Coalition agrees on) to the premise of Anselmo's article isn't just a leap, it's a somersault.But we're not talking about concepts. We're talking about the actual, as executed, parking protected bike lanes. And in their actual built form, they are weird, poorly executed, poorly understood, thinly used, and not terribly beneficial to bikers.
-
- Union Depot
- Posts: 321
- Joined: July 3rd, 2014, 1:38 pm
- Location: Lyndale Neighborhood
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
That's redundant. All criminals ride bikes when they are not riding the bus.Bike and crime sewer!
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4371
- Joined: February 8th, 2014, 11:33 pm
- Location: Marcy-Holmes
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
If bike lanes led to crime then Copenhagen would be a hell hole.
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
Or we could just install protected lanes on Hennepin and eliminate the bike lanes/widen the sidewalks on First. Problem solved.
- Sacrelicio
- Union Depot
- Posts: 364
- Joined: November 11th, 2015, 6:38 pm
- Location: Field
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
That's why cyclists don't want registration and license plates, so we can pander to criminals and win Dem votes from them.That's redundant. All criminals ride bikes when they are not riding the bus.Bike and crime sewer!
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
From:
https://streets.mn/2016/01/14/10-redevel ... p-in-2016/
https://streets.mn/2016/01/14/10-redevel ... p-in-2016/
What are the chances First Avenue closes after the Palace Theatre opens? If it did happen, could we see the current structure demolished?As First Avenue weathers rumors of its impending demise in Minneapolis (the collapsing ceiling didn’t help), its owners have quietly partnered with Jam Productions and the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority to reopen the Palace Theatre.
...
When it opens this year, the Palace will host traveling acts that can draw crowds of 3,000—a little bigger than First Avenue can hold.
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
I think that "impending demise" is a rhetorical flourish without any basis in reality. Based on my anecdotal experience, First Avenue seems to have more sold-out or almost sold-out shows than at any time I can remember.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6383
- Joined: May 31st, 2012, 7:27 pm
- Location: Standish-Ericsson
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
I edited that article for streets.mn (it originally appeared on The Line), and I truly have no idea where the author got that from. Just pure conjecture as far as I can tell. Unfortunately we don't ask for sources or take a heavy hand on editing contributions from The Line. If it were coming from a streets.mn author, I probably would have requested a link or something.
First Ave is a smashing success, with frequently sold out shows and is an absolute institution in the local music scene. That said, it's not a very big room, and bigger acts have to either play multiple nights in a row or book another venue. The Palace will be the next logical step up for shows that today are winding up at places like Roy Wilkins or The Myth (in Maplewood). Things would have to go horribly wrong with First Ave's management for its current status to diminish, let alone close. The only real competition downtown is Mill City Nights, which seems to go after different genres and more national acts than First Ave. Fine Line doesn't book as many shows as they used to and also seems to book the same types of acts as Mill City Nights.
P.S. Anyone else going to Polica in March? (3 sold out shows!! March 2-4. I'm going Friday March 4)
First Ave is a smashing success, with frequently sold out shows and is an absolute institution in the local music scene. That said, it's not a very big room, and bigger acts have to either play multiple nights in a row or book another venue. The Palace will be the next logical step up for shows that today are winding up at places like Roy Wilkins or The Myth (in Maplewood). Things would have to go horribly wrong with First Ave's management for its current status to diminish, let alone close. The only real competition downtown is Mill City Nights, which seems to go after different genres and more national acts than First Ave. Fine Line doesn't book as many shows as they used to and also seems to book the same types of acts as Mill City Nights.
P.S. Anyone else going to Polica in March? (3 sold out shows!! March 2-4. I'm going Friday March 4)
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
Let's say it did happen, would there be anything preventing the current structure from being demolished? The partnership with Palace Theatre could potentially provide a bridge for the current owners to allow time for a full redevelopment including new First Avenue space. I'm not trying to start a rumor and haven't heard anything to substantiate this, just wishfully speculating. The current structure is single-purpose and sits on such a prime location that could be better utilized. As much as I love First Avenue, I wouldn't mind seeing it reborn in a new multi-use building connected to its neighbors via skyway connections.
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4371
- Joined: February 8th, 2014, 11:33 pm
- Location: Marcy-Holmes
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
If it ever did close, it'd be the perfect spot for the Minnesota Music History Museum
Re: Downtown Minneapolis General Topics & Development Map
Don't count on it. It was built in 1936 as the Greyhound bus depot, and the Streamline Moderne style is very rare around here. Minneapolis's is one of the largest such Greyhound depots left standing nationwide.Let's say it did happen, would there be anything preventing the current structure from being demolished? The partnership with Palace Theatre could potentially provide a bridge for the current owners to allow time for a full redevelopment including new First Avenue space. I'm not trying to start a rumor and haven't heard anything to substantiate this, just wishfully speculating. The current structure is single-purpose and sits on such a prime location that could be better utilized. As much as I love First Avenue, I wouldn't mind seeing it reborn in a new multi-use building connected to its neighbors via skyway connections.
edit: Worth noting that, even apart from its architectural and historical significance, it's one of Minneapolis's most recognizable and famous landmarks. When I first told my mother that I was moving here, she asked me if I was going to go to "that venue from Purple Rain."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 48 guests