Since you've already unreasonably concluded that Northstar is a failure, I'll just leave you with this:BikesOnFilm wrote: November 26th, 2024, 11:43 am The federal government didn't provide enough money to connect to St. Cloud back when the line didn't exist and it was unknown whether that ridership would be high enough to justify the full route, but projected not to be enough.
Now that the line does exist, we absolutely know that ridership does not justify the extension.
So in a world where cities and municipalities are competing for the same pool of federal transportation funds (assuming we don't change this paradigm for one where states make their own decisions in the near future), does it make sense to compete for $600 million in funding for a project that will never be worth the cost, or to compete for funding for projects like the Blue Line Extension, BRT routes, or infrastructure updates to help establish state supported Amtrak routes? As an aside - we spent around $50 million on improvements for Borealis, and we shared that cost with WSDOT and federal partners. Spending $600 million because maybe that'll help a Borealis extension to Fargo is just not a good use of money.
I'm sorry, there's just not going to be a world where this is ever going to be worth it. If there was a way to use the St. Cloud Amtrak station, skip Becker, and not have to do any sort of capacity expansion to the tracks, it would be one thing. But it seems, for one reason or another, that this isn't an option.
That's to say nothing about what we'd actually be buying for that money - say you make St. Cloud into an affordable bedroom community for Minneapolis with convenient service of 6-8 trains a day that gets a lot of love and ridership. St. Cloud's current parking regulations call for 2 parking spaces per unit. Their comprehensive plan cites proposed township annexations as a way to facilitate growth, and says explicitly that "single family homes will remain the dominant land use in the city."
If you had to choose to make it easier and more affordable to live in St. Cloud and commute to work by transit to Minneapolis, or make it easier and more affordable to live and commute to work by transit in Columbia Heights, Richfield, St. Louis Park, or Robbinsdale, what makes the most sense from an ecological or urbanist perspective? Hint - it's not a $600 million dollar bailout to sprawl in Stearns County.
Do you think the Borealis would be as successful as it is if it only went slightly over half way between Chicago and the Twin Cities, and in the small town of Tomah passengers had to transfer to a bus to reach the Twin Cities? Would you consider it a failure and not worth saving because it didn't reach ridership expectations and more funding would be needed for the Borealis to reach the Twin Cities? By your logic, why bailout the sprawling Twin Cities just so some tourists can ride a train instead of driving to Chicago for their weekend trips?