And it's not the first time a Riverview-Midtown through-route has been discussed on the forums. Great ideas that keep coming up.The only new ideas are the new Gold Line, the connection of Midtown to Ford
Twin Cities Future Transit Map
-
- Stone Arch Bridge
- Posts: 7761
- Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
- Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1150
- Joined: November 12th, 2015, 11:35 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
Yes, you're right of course, I meant "new" as in "not formally proposed or studied."And it's not the first time a Riverview-Midtown through-route has been discussed on the forums. Great ideas that keep coming up.The only new ideas are the new Gold Line, the connection of Midtown to Ford
Should just give better visibility to the 94, which will always the best way to go straight from downtown to downtown.Like the idea of the gold line if it could be more of an express than the current Green Line. Limit number of stops, to get people from Minneapolis to St Paul faster.
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
If/when 94 between the downtowns gets MnPASS lanes, it seems like a no-brainer to replace Route 94 with an extension of the Gold Line (Gateway BRT). Would greatly increase the prominence of the 94 service, and it would probably boost Gold Line ridership from the East Side significantly.
-
- Stone Arch Bridge
- Posts: 7761
- Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
- Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
I'm guessing there's far more demand for downtown-to-downtown than for the Gold Line itself. So why not through-route a few St. Paul BRT services to Minneapolis? For example, Gold Line, Rush Line, and maybe Red Rock if that ever becomes BRT. All of those services could enter DT St. Paul and proceed along a common route to DT Minneapolis. Come up with some sort of label add-on for this downtown connector service. It would also likely increase ridership of these past-St.Paul BRT services if riders could have a one-seat ride to/from Minneapolis.
-
- Union Depot
- Posts: 390
- Joined: March 27th, 2013, 8:22 am
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
One of the ideas I've been kicking around in my head for awhile is an express LRT line between the DT's. I think the best way to accomplish that would be to run in a dedicated lane down the center of 94. On the STP end you use the tracks between Union Depot and the X that will be already be there because of Riverview. And on the MPLS side you link into the Blue Line tracks around Cedar-Riverside. Add in stops at Snelling and somewhere around the U.
Obviously it could be challenging to lose a lane in both directions on 94 but if you could have LRT passing cars at 55-65 MPH in the middle of rush hour it wouldn't be hard to convince people to ride it. There would be capacity issues in each DT's but that's going to be an issue with any expansion of rail in either DT
Obviously it could be challenging to lose a lane in both directions on 94 but if you could have LRT passing cars at 55-65 MPH in the middle of rush hour it wouldn't be hard to convince people to ride it. There would be capacity issues in each DT's but that's going to be an issue with any expansion of rail in either DT
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
Umm, you know the Green Line was originally planned to be this, but the neighborhoods didn't want something else to divide communities like 94, and the Met Council wanted development, so a 94 route was scrapped for University...One of the ideas I've been kicking around in my head for awhile is an express LRT line between the DT's.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: March 30th, 2016, 1:26 pm
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
How about monorail or maglev? Wouldn't take up any land (besides pillars and stations) and it could operate even faster than rail on 94. Besides the two downtowns have one stop somewhere near the U of M and one at Snelling.
Of course I would be satisfied with the existing Route 94, Green Line, and numerous regional rail routes operating as a S-Bahn system connecting the two downtowns and branching off outside the urban core.
Of course I would be satisfied with the existing Route 94, Green Line, and numerous regional rail routes operating as a S-Bahn system connecting the two downtowns and branching off outside the urban core.
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
Maglev? I mean, that would be awesome. Unless we're playing Sim City, completely unrealistic.How about monorail or maglev? Wouldn't take up any land (besides pillars and stations) and it could operate even faster than rail on 94. Besides the two downtowns have one stop somewhere near the U of M and one at Snelling.
Of course I would be satisfied with the existing Route 94, Green Line, and numerous regional rail routes operating as a S-Bahn system connecting the two downtowns and branching off outside the urban core.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: March 30th, 2016, 1:26 pm
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
With that viewpoint we wouldn't even have Interstate 94 (for better or worse).Maglev? I mean, that would be awesome. Unless we're playing Sim City, completely unrealistic.How about monorail or maglev? Wouldn't take up any land (besides pillars and stations) and it could operate even faster than rail on 94. Besides the two downtowns have one stop somewhere near the U of M and one at Snelling.
Of course I would be satisfied with the existing Route 94, Green Line, and numerous regional rail routes operating as a S-Bahn system connecting the two downtowns and branching off outside the urban core.
-
- Union Depot
- Posts: 321
- Joined: July 3rd, 2014, 1:38 pm
- Location: Lyndale Neighborhood
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
The green line (formerly central line) planning process choice to prioritize neighborhood service and development along University does not negate the strong desire for faster, better, direct intercity rail transport. Many have argued that it should have been a "Both/And" situation instead of an "Either/Or". I think they made the correct choice if we are limited to one option, but we don't need to be limited in a "Fantasy Map" scenario.Umm, you know the Green Line was originally planned to be this, but the neighborhoods didn't want something else to divide communities like 94, and the Met Council wanted development, so a 94 route was scrapped for University...One of the ideas I've been kicking around in my head for awhile is an express LRT line between the DT's.
-
- Union Depot
- Posts: 390
- Joined: March 27th, 2013, 8:22 am
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
1. I am aware of the community wanted in University but as BoredAgain said it didn't have to be an "either/or" it could have been a "both/and". You could make a case that adding an express dedicated right of way service between the DT's along 94 and along with adding or relocating Green Line stations would do more to serve the community.
2. I wasn't trying to downplay the loss of a driving lane on 94 it's a real issue but I also think it would remove a large number of cars, and buses for that matter, from the interstate.
3. It's a fantasy idea, like most listed in the thread.
2. I wasn't trying to downplay the loss of a driving lane on 94 it's a real issue but I also think it would remove a large number of cars, and buses for that matter, from the interstate.
3. It's a fantasy idea, like most listed in the thread.
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
One thought I've had, in the realm of fantasy-but-still-plausible, is that the urban segments of both 35W and 94 would be great candidates for median-running LRT, with freeway lids surrounding the stations. We have a huge logistical advantage over something like the Big Dig in that our urban highways are already below-grade. You could use development rights on the lids to avoid the stations-in-the-middle-of-nowhere problem common to freeway transit, as well as reconnect neighborhoods and partially finance the project. It's basically (a) a subway without any digging, (b) a way to heal the scars of the urban highway projects, and (c) a way to create new land in our most valuable areas.
The 94 project could connect the downtowns in 15 minutes instead of 40, with access to, and huge nontransit benefits for, important and under-served areas like Rondo, Hamline, Seward, Convention Center, and even Loring if it looped around downtown. 35W could finally give some sort of permanent transit to South as well as serving our busiest commuter corridor with an appropriate capacity.
Apparently MnDOT has at least considered a similar concept relatively recently: https://urbanland.uli.org/industry-sect ... velopment/
The 94 project could connect the downtowns in 15 minutes instead of 40, with access to, and huge nontransit benefits for, important and under-served areas like Rondo, Hamline, Seward, Convention Center, and even Loring if it looped around downtown. 35W could finally give some sort of permanent transit to South as well as serving our busiest commuter corridor with an appropriate capacity.
Apparently MnDOT has at least considered a similar concept relatively recently: https://urbanland.uli.org/industry-sect ... velopment/
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
You could probably do this cheaper (but with most of the benefits) by having MnPASS lanes added on 94 similar to 35W and then build the land bridges with improved stations in the center. Cheaper than putting down rail, but still connecting the downtowns.
-
- Nicollet Mall
- Posts: 141
- Joined: January 29th, 2021, 4:24 pm
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
So, the regional transit expansion plans are coming to fruition with Green Line extension underway, the Orange Line about to open and the Gold Line coming close to construction. Obviously, the Blue Line extension, Purple Line and Riverview are still in planning stages, but appear to be moving along. When does Metro Transit/ the Met Council add new projects to the list? I mean, is there some plan that gets updated every 5 or 10 years or something? It appears that metro counties are responsible for proposing routes that eventually get picked up by the Met Council. It also seems that Metro Transit proposes ABRT routes. Am I misrepresenting the process?
It is unclear what projects might show up on a future list outside of the Midtown Greenway streetcar, Red Rock corridor and Highway 55 BRT. Maybe extension of the Green Line south to Shakopee, Blue Line north to Osseo or Maple Grove? I would like to see some study of a downtown Minneapolis bus and/or rail tunnel at some point.
It is unclear what projects might show up on a future list outside of the Midtown Greenway streetcar, Red Rock corridor and Highway 55 BRT. Maybe extension of the Green Line south to Shakopee, Blue Line north to Osseo or Maple Grove? I would like to see some study of a downtown Minneapolis bus and/or rail tunnel at some point.
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
Under the increased revenue scenerio of the 2040 plan they had the 169 BRT. 394 BRT. 36 BRT. 35W North BRT. North Central Rail. Greenway streetcar. Orange Line extension. Red Line extension. Red Rock.So, the regional transit expansion plans are coming to fruition with Green Line extension underway, the Orange Line about to open and the Gold Line coming close to construction. Obviously, the Blue Line extension, Purple Line and Riverview are still in planning stages, but appear to be moving along. When does Metro Transit/ the Met Council add new projects to the list? I mean, is there some plan that gets updated every 5 or 10 years or something? It appears that metro counties are responsible for proposing routes that eventually get picked up by the Met Council. It also seems that Metro Transit proposes ABRT routes. Am I misrepresenting the process?
It is unclear what projects might show up on a future list outside of the Midtown Greenway streetcar, Red Rock corridor and Highway 55 BRT. Maybe extension of the Green Line south to Shakopee, Blue Line north to Osseo or Maple Grove? I would like to see some study of a downtown Minneapolis bus and/or rail tunnel at some point.
These plans often change and now is the time in my opinion to start building coalitions and groups to advocate for the 2050 plan that will be released in 2025. All of these extensions will help mostly the suburbs and autocentric regions (except Midtown Greenway). And I think we need to think bigger with our transit as a region.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1777
- Joined: May 31st, 2012, 8:02 pm
- Location: Chicago (ex-Minneapolitan)
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
Counties conduct feasibility studies for transit ways, and there is a process for them to eventually be taken over by the Met Council for implementation.
The Transportation Policy Plan is amended to include the transitways as they are planned.
Arterial BRT is a Metro Transit initiative to improve local bus service. The Midtown Corridor study (which was conducted by Metro Transit - not Hennepin County) is the only one I can think of that has recommended aBRT.
The Transportation Policy Plan is amended to include the transitways as they are planned.
Arterial BRT is a Metro Transit initiative to improve local bus service. The Midtown Corridor study (which was conducted by Metro Transit - not Hennepin County) is the only one I can think of that has recommended aBRT.
-
- Nicollet Mall
- Posts: 141
- Joined: January 29th, 2021, 4:24 pm
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
Well, that's disappointing to see that extensive list of BRT routes serving mostly low-density, car-oriented suburbs. Both Minneapolis and St. Paul are growing and becoming more densely populated and deserve transit improvements beyond a handful of ABRT lines. Minneapolis, in particular, already has population density in some areas warranting rail transit with dedicated right of way (i.e. Nicollet Ave S., Uptown, Phillips, etc.). It seems the Minneapolis 2040 Plan will provide the opportunity for the City to grow even faster than the 50,000 new residents seen last decade with potential to surpass 500,000 well before 2050.
-
- Nicollet Mall
- Posts: 141
- Joined: January 29th, 2021, 4:24 pm
Re: Twin Cities Future Transit Map
Does anyone on this forum pay attention to the Met Council proceedings, and if so, has that agency discussed what they might do with a portion of the $800 million in transit funding coming to MN? A recent Star Tribune article suggests that the Purple, Gold and Blue Line and more ABRT routes will use the funds.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests